Single sterile silicon ring technique for utilization of upper limb intravenous regional anesthesia: A prospective study of patients with operated distal radius fractures

Kitridis, Dimitrios; Chalidis, Byron; Asouhidou, Irene; Koraki, Eleni; Givissis, Panagiotis

doi:10.1016/j.injury.2021.08.011

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This king of stability is dynamic, and long-term dynamic stability has a longitudinal squeezing effect on the fracture end, which can speed up the fracture healing. [26][27][28] Limitations of this study: Fewer patients were included, and long-term efficacy observations were lacking. In future more patients will be included and long-term studies will be conducted to evaluate the value of fracture upper limb fixator in emergency treatment of patients with upper limb fractures.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Clinical application of upper limb fracture fixator in emergency treatment of upper limb fracture

Xiong,

Le,

Zhao

et al. 2023

Pak J Med Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To compare and analyze the curative effect of fracture upper limb fixator and traditional splint in emergency treatment of upper limb fracture. Methods: This is a prospective study. A total of 80 patients with upper limb fractures admitted to the Emergency Department of Sichuan Province Orthopedic Hospital from December 2021 to August 2022 were prospectively selected as subjects. They were divided into two groups according to the random number table method: Patients in the control group were treated with traditional splint, while those in the observation group were treated with medical adjustable upper limb fixator. The clinical efficacy, treatment time, pain, fitness, probability of secondary injury and complications were compared between the two groups. Results: After treatment, the excellent and good rate in the observation group (75.00%) was higher than that in the control group(52.50%). There was no statistically significant difference in the treatment time between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the probability of secondary injury between the two group. Statistically significant difference was observed in the comparison of pain conditions between the two groups. The total fitness rate of the observation group (97.50%) was higher than that of the control group (75.00%). The total incidence of complications in the observation group (2.50%) was lower than that in the control group (20.00%), with a statistically significant difference. Conclusion: Fracture upper limb fixator shows various benefits in first aid of upper limb fractures, such as improving the clinical efficacy of patients with upper limb fractures, ameliorating pain, improving fitness effect, and reducing the probability of complications. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.39.6.7097 How to cite this: Xiong L, Le J, Zhao C, Yuan R, Yang M, Shen H. Clinical application of upper limb fracture fixator in emergency treatment of upper limb fracture. Pak J Med Sci. 2023;39(6):---------. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.39.6.7097 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This king of stability is dynamic, and long-term dynamic stability has a longitudinal squeezing effect on the fracture end, which can speed up the fracture healing. 26 - 28 …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%