2017
DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000003179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-Tooth Osteotomy Combined Wide Linear Corticotomy Under Local Anesthesia for Correcting Anterior Protrusion With Ectopically Erupted Canine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was thought to enhance the healing of a segmental osteotomy and a localised single tooth corticotomy around the canine, all of which were performed under local anaesthesia. The authors conclude that this resulted in a decrease in canine retraction time [43].…”
Section: Prf and Periodontally Accelerated Osteogenic Orthodonticsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This was thought to enhance the healing of a segmental osteotomy and a localised single tooth corticotomy around the canine, all of which were performed under local anaesthesia. The authors conclude that this resulted in a decrease in canine retraction time [43].…”
Section: Prf and Periodontally Accelerated Osteogenic Orthodonticsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The reasons for the excluded records are summarised in Table A4 [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Selection Of the Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alhasyimi et al [24] Animal study Che et al [25] Review article Dukka et al [26] Case Report Janssen et al [27] Evaluates PRP and not PRF Stasiak et al [28] Systematic review Shetty et al [29] Trial registration Subbalekha et al [30] Trial registration Avinash et al [31] Trial registration Tehranchi et al [32] Trial registration Mazzone et al [33] Not orthodontic field Shah et al [34] Technical note Iskenderoglu et al [35] Case Report Dimofte et al [36] Review article Nadon et al [37] Evaluate a derivate of PRF Aras et al [38] Case Report Findik et al [39] Case Report…”
Section: Reason For Exclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%