2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.mlwa.2022.100393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-trial stimuli classification from detected P300 for augmented Brain–Computer Interface: A deep learning approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was shown in an interesting investigation, where a set of six pictures of familiar objects was correctly classified with an AI classificator based on the P300 response in a small group of healthy subjects and three post-stroke people with an accuracy of 91.79% and 89.68% for healthy and disabled subjects, respectively (Cortez et al, 2021). Higher levels of accuracy were obtained in healthy controls by Proverbio and coworkers by automatically classifying electrical signals relative to 12 perceptual categories by means of statistical analyses , and supervised machine-learning systems (Leoni et al, 2021(Leoni et al, , 2022 applied to ERPs (Leoni et al, 2021) and EEG single-trials (Leoni et al, 2022). Apart from this literature, we are not aware of BCI studies currently using pictorial communication systems to investigate sensations, volitional and affective states.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was shown in an interesting investigation, where a set of six pictures of familiar objects was correctly classified with an AI classificator based on the P300 response in a small group of healthy subjects and three post-stroke people with an accuracy of 91.79% and 89.68% for healthy and disabled subjects, respectively (Cortez et al, 2021). Higher levels of accuracy were obtained in healthy controls by Proverbio and coworkers by automatically classifying electrical signals relative to 12 perceptual categories by means of statistical analyses , and supervised machine-learning systems (Leoni et al, 2021(Leoni et al, , 2022 applied to ERPs (Leoni et al, 2021) and EEG single-trials (Leoni et al, 2022). Apart from this literature, we are not aware of BCI studies currently using pictorial communication systems to investigate sensations, volitional and affective states.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clear evidences have been provided of reliable electrophysiological markers for motor imagery (e.g., Milanés-Hermosilla et al, 2021 ; Mattioli et al, 2022 ), and, to a lesser extent, perceptual and cognitive imagery ( Cai et al, 2013 ; Leoni et al, 2021 , 2022 ; Proverbio et al, 2022 ), for communication with brain computer interface (BCI) systems ( Ash and Benson, 2018 ). In contrast, not much is known about the electrophysiological markers of motivational imagery (craves, wills, needs and desires), despite the fact that this particular type of mental content is valuable for interacting with patients with disorders of consciousness, such as coma or locked-in syndrome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it would be impractical to collect an enormously large number of single trials to generate large ensembles of high SNR ERPs to form training and test sets. The most obvious solution is to use single trails directly, without averaging, as attempted in the design of customized brain computer interfaces (BCIs) which are typically controlled by the presentation of a single stimulus, that is, by single trials [28][29][30][31][32][33]. In general, irrespective of the application, high classification accuracies cannot be expected with single trials due to the poor SNR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%