2023
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.35311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single Versus Two Plate Osteosynthesis for Parasymphysis Fractures of the Mandible: A Prospective Comparative Study

Abstract: BackgroundThe treatment of mandibular fractures has undergone a revolutionary change after the invention of miniplate osteosynthesis. There aren't many studies in the literature comparing the outcomes of treating mandibular parasymphysis fractures with two miniplates versus one miniplate. AimTo evaluate the outcomes of single vs. two plate osteosynthesis in the management of parasymphysis fractures of the mandible. Materials and methodsSixteen patients with parasymphysis fracture of the mandible treated with a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each treatment modality accounts for its reasoning. Regarding rigid internal fixation, for instance, while the single miniplate technique was superior in exhibiting fewer postoperative complications, the two-plate technique was superior in showing more stability [ 18 , 19 ]. Consequently, weighing the pros and cons of each treatment modality is essential to sound decision-making and individualized therapy for patients based on their conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each treatment modality accounts for its reasoning. Regarding rigid internal fixation, for instance, while the single miniplate technique was superior in exhibiting fewer postoperative complications, the two-plate technique was superior in showing more stability [ 18 , 19 ]. Consequently, weighing the pros and cons of each treatment modality is essential to sound decision-making and individualized therapy for patients based on their conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%