Generalized Multipole Techniques for Electromagnetic and Light Scattering 1999
DOI: 10.1016/b978-044450282-7/50017-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Singularities of Wave Fields and Numerical Methods of Solving the Boundary-Value Problems for Helmholtz Equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned in Section 2, the location of the multipole expansions should in principle depend on (1) the exciting field ⌽ exc D i (for the sake of simplicity in this description, we consider that the exciting field is acting only in domain D i ), (2) the geometry of the domains (which in the 2D case is given by the interface curve ⌫ ij ϵ ‫ץ‬D ij ), and (3) their material properties i , j . Some authors 55,56 working with the GMT do indeed use the information about ⌽ exc D i to find the position of the sources. They compute the analytical continuation of the exciting field in the domain D j (the so-called nonphysical domain).…”
Section: Automatic Multipole Setting For Cylindrical Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned in Section 2, the location of the multipole expansions should in principle depend on (1) the exciting field ⌽ exc D i (for the sake of simplicity in this description, we consider that the exciting field is acting only in domain D i ), (2) the geometry of the domains (which in the 2D case is given by the interface curve ⌫ ij ϵ ‫ץ‬D ij ), and (3) their material properties i , j . Some authors 55,56 working with the GMT do indeed use the information about ⌽ exc D i to find the position of the sources. They compute the analytical continuation of the exciting field in the domain D j (the so-called nonphysical domain).…”
Section: Automatic Multipole Setting For Cylindrical Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Как показано в работе [5], предлагаемый подход, который можно назвать модифицированным МПГУ, базируется на более аккуратном учете физических свойств реальной структуры и позволяет существенно увеличить точность расчетов. Действительно, результаты работ [14][15][16] убедительно демонстрируют, что учет априорной информации дает возможность значительно повысить эффективность алгоритма решения задачи дифракции.…”
Section: основные соотношенияunclassified
“…2D boundary-value problems of this theory are studied, as a rule, using several popular methods, such as the Rayleigh method and its modern versions [13][14][15][16], the Fourier modal method and the C-method [6,8,10,17], rigorous coupled-wave methods and cross-section methods (differential methods) [8,9], finite-element methods [18], and analytical regularization methods [6,[10][11][12]. The advantages and disadvantages of these frequency-domain methods are well known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%