Sinus bone formation and implant survival after sinus membrane elevation and implant placement: a 1‐ to 6‐year follow‐up study

Cricchio, Giovanni; Sennerby, Lars; Lundgren, Stefan

doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02096.x

Cited by 102 publications

(131 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

122

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Lundgren et al (2004) were the first to report about an osteoinductive potential by elevation of the Schneiderian membrane in combination with implant placement. Later especially the publications of Felice et al, Cricchio et al andKaneko et al added up to this knowledge (Lundgren et al, 2004, 2008;Hatano et al, 2007;Cricchio et al, 2011b).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 84%

“…Bone formation by sinus membrane elevation has been proven in several studies (Lundgren et al, 2004(Lundgren et al, , 2008Palma et al, 2006;Cricchio et al, 2011aCricchio et al, , 2011bCricchio et al, , 2014Jungner et al, 2014).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…It is known that sinus membrane elevation in the atrophic maxilla will lead to new bone formation. The elevation can be accomplished by using the implants directly as a pillar under the membrane in a one-stage implant procedure (Lundgren et al, 2004;Hatano et al, 2007;Lundgren et al, 2008;Cricchio et al, 2011b). Another option is to use a spaceholder above the implants (Kaneko et al, 2012) or a spaceholder for sinus elevation in a two-staged implant procedure (Felice et al, 2009).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 98%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Elevation of the maxillary sinus membrane for de-novo bone formation: First results of a prospective study in humans

Lie¹,

Merten²,

Meyns³

et al. 2015

Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 84%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 98%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 98%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Elevation of the maxillary sinus membrane for de-novo bone formation: First results of a prospective study in humans

Lie¹,

Merten²,

Meyns³

et al. 2015

Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The survival rate was 98,7%, and the average new bone formation was 5.3mm after 6 months of healing. Resonance Frequency Analyses showed adequate primary stability and small changes over time [10] . In a case letter by Dikicier et al, placement of two implants in the maxillary sinus was studied.…”

Section: Observational Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

2017

Int. J. Appl. Dent. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: To review the literature associated with new bone formation in the maxillary sinus elevation using peripheral venous blood alone. Materials and Methods: A review of the literature was performed to record the study reference, design study, sinus lift method, number of patients, number of implants, follow up, bone gain and Perforation of sinus. A PubMed search was made from 2007 to 2017 with keywords: "sinus lift", "Peripheral Venous Blood", "new bone" and "maxillary sinus elevation". Results: 11 articles were identified and reviewed. The Lateral Window method was followed in all the studied publications. The survival rate of implants was high in all cases. A new bone is formed in most cases. Conclusion: According to our review, the application of bone graft material may not be a requirement for maxillary sinus augmentation and new bone formation with peripheral venous blood as a filler material could be an alternative treatment modality for the implant treatment.

show abstract

“…The bone increase was performed with a transcrestal guided approach of sinus lift (TGSL) (1), using a surgical technique or in combination with drills and osteotomes foam-compactors. The review of the international literature allows to consider this work as the second prospective study with TGSL technique but unlike its predecessor does not resort to grafting materials as simply uses the same implant as a space maintainer (47,48).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Transcrestal guided sinus lift without grafting materials: a 36 months clinical prospective study

Spinelli¹,

Vico²,

Condò

et al. 2015

ORL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SUMMARYPurpose. This study describes the ability to perform a technique for bone regeneration in maxillary posterior deficit (TGSL) without the use of bone grafting materials using a highly minimally invasive protocol. Materials and methods. Sixty six implants have been inserted in the sinus floor of a total of 39 patients through the transcrestal guided sinus lift technique (TGSL). All patients have been followed for at least three years in function. The drilling protocol was adapted on the basis of bone density of each implant site to achieve a torque between 45 and 55 Ncm. Healing titanium abutments tightened to 35 Ncm have been used. A CAD/CAM metal ceramics final prosthetic restoration has been generated a six months after the tissues healing and the provisional functionalization of the occlusion. Survival rate of implants and prostheses, biological and biomechanical complications, changes in marginal bone levels, and total height of alveolar crest bone before and after surgery have been evaluate and measured by the results obtained in this prospective study. It was also measured the periodontal parameters as well as levels of perception of pain by the patient during the entire recovery period.Results. The result of the data of follow-up was 41.96 (24 to 36) months. Cumulative implant survival was 98.53% at 3 years. There were no biological and mechanical complications and there were no prosthetic failures during the whole period of follow-up. The Marginal Bone Loss (MBL) average during the first year of operation was from 0.33 to 0.36 mm, while the 3-year follow-up, the MBL average was 0.51 to 0.29 mm. The average of residual bone height of alveolar ridge before treatment was 6.7 to 1.6 mm (range 5.1 to 9.2 mm), while the average bone height was gained 6,4 -1.6 mm (range 3.2 to 8.1 mm). All patients reported lower pain levels and found to have normal periodontal parameters. Conclusions. This study suggests that the use of guided surgery to perform transcrestal maxillary sinus lift to increase the sub-antral crestal height is a minimally invasive technique of success for the short and medium-term of follow-up, thus avoiding the extended treatment time and reducing the morbidity associated with the lifting of the floor of the maxillary sinus with traditional technique using bone grafting materials. Furthermore, this protocol without the use of graft materials does not vary the final outcome that have demonstrated the presence of newly formed bone around implants offering always predictable results, and giving a further reduction in the costs of the procedure rehabilitation.

show abstract

Sinus bone formation and implant survival after sinus membrane elevation and implant placement: a 1‐ to 6‐year follow‐up study

Cited by 102 publications

References 37 publications

Elevation of the maxillary sinus membrane for de-novo bone formation: First results of a prospective study in humans

Elevation of the maxillary sinus membrane for de-novo bone formation: First results of a prospective study in humans

Untitled

Transcrestal guided sinus lift without grafting materials: a 36 months clinical prospective study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About