2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-019-8231-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site characterization through combined analysis of seismic and electrical resistivity data at a site of Dhanbad, Jharkhand, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The frequencies range from 0.015625 Hz (2 −6 Hz) to 8192 Hz (2 13 Hz) and can be combined according to different frequencies. Considering the parameters of the detection model shown in Figure 1, the excitation signal in this study adopts the frequency combination of three-frequency waves, specifically including three-frequency components of 1 Hz, 8 Hz, and 64 Hz (2 0 , 2 3 , and 2 6 ). For the continuous pseudorandom multifrequency response signal, the amplitude and phase information of the extracted frequency response signal can be obtained by multiplying the sine or cosine function of the frequency component to be extracted and integrating the product.…”
Section: Pseudorandom Electromagnetic Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The frequencies range from 0.015625 Hz (2 −6 Hz) to 8192 Hz (2 13 Hz) and can be combined according to different frequencies. Considering the parameters of the detection model shown in Figure 1, the excitation signal in this study adopts the frequency combination of three-frequency waves, specifically including three-frequency components of 1 Hz, 8 Hz, and 64 Hz (2 0 , 2 3 , and 2 6 ). For the continuous pseudorandom multifrequency response signal, the amplitude and phase information of the extracted frequency response signal can be obtained by multiplying the sine or cosine function of the frequency component to be extracted and integrating the product.…”
Section: Pseudorandom Electromagnetic Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] In the past 20 years, cross-well detection technology has gradually developed into two kinds of detection methods with different physical mechanisms: cross-well seismic and cross-well electromagnetic detection. [5][6][7][8][9] The results show that, compared with the cross-well seismic method, the cross-well electromagnetic detection method is more sensitive to the changes in cross-well formation characteristics and fluid properties, and can directly provide the resistivity distribution information describe the reservoir cross-well fluid spatial distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rayleigh waves will propagate most effectively in which frequency range is defined as the dominant frequency (fo) [8]. This technique, have been extensively studied by many researchers to measure the site effects such as amplification, ambient noise produced by soft ground layers in certain frequency bands [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. Soil behavior analysis depends not only on the geomorphology and properties of the subterranean soil layers, but also on the bedrock type and location.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An earthquake is a natural phenomenon that has caused huge loss of physical damage in di erent countries, e.g., Armenia, Iran, California, Japan, Greece, Turkey, India, Sumatra, Pakistan, China, and Haiti. erefore, globally multi-dimensional earthquake hazard assessment studies by [1][2][3][4] have been performed. Several studies have shown that most Asian regions, including Pakistan, are vulnerable to seismic events [5] because they are located near active faults [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%