Situating requests for medical aid in dying within the broader context of end-of-life care: ethical considerations

Abstract

BackgroundMedical aid in dying (MAiD) was introduced in Quebec in 2015. Quebec clinical guidelines recommend that MAiD be approached as a last resort when other care options are insufficient; however, the law sets no such requirement. To date, little is known about when and how requests for MAiD are situated in the broader context of decision-making in end-of-life care; the timing of MAiD raises potential ethical issues.MethodsA retrospective chart review of all MAiD requests between December 2015 and June 2017 at two Quebec hospitals and one long-term care centre was conducted to explore the relationship between routine end-of-life care practices and the timing of MAiD requests.ResultsOf 80 patients requesting MAiD, 54% (43) received the intervention. The median number of days between the request for MAiD and the patient’s death was 6 days. The majority of palliative care consults (32%) came less than 7 days prior to the MAiD request and in another 25% of cases occurred the day of or after MAiD was requested. 35% of patients had no level of intervention form, or it was documented as 1 or 2 (prolongation of life remains a priority) at the time of the MAiD request and 19% were receiving life-prolonging interventions.InterpretationWe highlight ethical considerations relating to the timing of MAiD requests within the broader context of end-of-life care. Whether or not MAiD is conceptualised as morally distinct from other end-of-life options is likely to influence clinicians’ approach to requests for MAiD as well as the ethical importance of our findings. We suggest that in the wake of the 2015 legislation, requests for MAiD have not always appeared to come after an exploration of other options as professional practice guidelines recommend.

“I Am Okay With It, But I Am Not Going to Do It”: The Exogenous Factors Influencing Non-Participation in Medical Assistance in Dying

“…As Seller et al (2019) noted, HCPs' responses to MAID inquiries are influenced by their conceptualization of MAID relative to other EOL care options. This was evident in our findings in HCPs' concern regarding a lack of adequate EOL care resources.…”

“…The CHPCA and CSPCP (2019) believe that MAID is not part of hospice PC practice as they are fundamentally different, whereas CAMAP (2020) encourages the integration of PC and MAID. Understanding these differences in the fundamental beliefs related to EOL care is essential because HCPs' response to MAID inquiries is influenced by their conceptualization of MAID relative to other EOL care options (Seller et al, 2019).…”

Extending Medical Aid in Dying to Incompetent Patients: A Qualitative Descriptive Study of the Attitudes of People Living with Alzheimer’s Disease in Quebec

“…Moreover, referring to the disability paradox, some authors argue that expected experiences of dementia patients are often more negative than actual experiences (17,20). As such, their case is distinct from that of patients who currently have access to MAiD in Quebec since these mainly base their requests on their current suffering (49,50).…”

Watching the watchmen: changing tides in the oversight of medical assistance in dying

“…Complex cases often require testimony, which takes even more time and deliberation. Patients often die while waiting for these requirements to be met 36. In states where clinician administration is prohibited, such as in the USA and certain jurisdictions in Australia, these delays could mean no longer being able to self-administer.…”