Developmental and Life-Course Criminological Theories 2017
DOI: 10.4324/9781315094908-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Situational Action Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fourthly, in the present study we focused only on the personal determinants of ASB involvement, and specifically on two aspects of the moral domain, that is, values and judgments. Future studies should expand the focus not only to the personal determinants but also to the environmental ones, as the level of exposure to criminogenic settings, that some models consider as fundamental in relation to the development of delinquency (Wikström, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourthly, in the present study we focused only on the personal determinants of ASB involvement, and specifically on two aspects of the moral domain, that is, values and judgments. Future studies should expand the focus not only to the personal determinants but also to the environmental ones, as the level of exposure to criminogenic settings, that some models consider as fundamental in relation to the development of delinquency (Wikström, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Criminology as a discipline is fragmented (Wikström et al, 2017) with theories often competing for empirical supremacy rather than toward integration (see Hirschi, 1969). Where deterrence and rational choice theories fall short is focusing on situational aspects of offending to the detriment of developmental antecedents (Cornish & Clarke, 2017).…”
Section: Toward Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, developmental theories often overlook the proximate situational factors that influence offending. Combining these two frameworks merges two typically competing perspectives of offending: individual propensity and situational factors (for prior examples, see Altikriti, 2021; Nagin & Paternoster, 1993; Piquero & Tibbetts, 1996; Wikström et al, 2017). Collectively, evidence from the literature suggests a link between PPTs and perceptions of risk, between PPTs and offending, and between perceptions of risk and offending.…”
Section: Toward Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A detailed presentation of the RAF is beyond the scope of this article. The framework, which draws on Wikström's () situational action theory and opportunity and social ecological theories of offending, was developed to articulate the relations between causal factors and processes at multiple levels of analysis (individual, situational, social ecological, systemic) across each phase of the lone‐actor terrorist event (radicalization, attack planning and preparation, attack; see Bouhana et al., , for an in‐depth discussion).…”
Section: Analytical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%