Six Sigma for dynamic capabilities development: becoming more flexible organizations

Abstract

Purpose Once the operational benefits of Six Sigma are well-recognized in the literature, this research advances the strategic advantages of this initiative. Thus, this paper aims to analyze how dynamic capabilities (DCs) mediates the relationship between Six Sigma implementation and organizational flexibility, not discussed in the literature yet. Design/methodology/approach Data from 66 Six Sigma European firms are used for a structural equation modeling and additional tests –Baron and Kenny’s test and Preacher and Hayes’s test – to analyze the mediating role of DCs. Following the scholars’ recommendations, the authors have created a second-order factor explained by knowledge absorption, organizational learning and knowledge integration to measure DCs. Flexibility, understood as the capacity for organizational adaptation, is measured through its operational and strategic dimensions. Findings The results show a significant relationship between Six Sigma practices – team management and statistical metrics – and DCs. In addition, the authors find support for a significant relationship between DCs and the operational and strategic dimensions of flexibility. Finally, the results confirm that DCs act as a mediating variable in the relationship between Six Sigma practices and flexibility. Practical implications The study contributes to literature that supports the decision to implement Six Sigma. In particular, key Six Sigma practices are identified for those managers who wish to foster DCs generation and organizational flexibility inside their companies. Originality/value This research analyzes the relationship between Six Sigma and strategic variables, answering the call for research about Six Sigma influence on long-term organizational success.

How managers' cognitive frames affect the use of process improvement approaches in new product development

“…Also, Tuli and Shankar (2015) claim that lean can improve NPD process performance in terms of quality, time to market, and risk management by aligning people and processes towards a common goal. Gutierrez-Gutierrez et al. (2020) find a positive impact of Six Sigma on flexibility.…”

Analysis of Product Quality Improvements to Reduce Coffee Bean Defects with Six Sigma Method

“…Six Sigma has a strategic objective to reduce the occurrence of defects in a production process with the ultimate goal of reducing process variation through special improvement programs and structured methods [7]. Jacobs (2015:20)…”

Sustainability of Railway Undertaking Services with Lean Philosophy in Risk Management—Case Study

“…Respecting the research conducted by Lirazzeli, Lean philosophy requires a complexity of tools as well as a continuous training of employees [59]. The successful adoption of Six Sigma in an organization is dependent, at least in part, on the adoption of Six Sigma at the individual level [60]. Parekh says that the Six Sigma technique can evaluate the quality of current activities and can quantify the improvement goals so as to control success in critical activities for the project [61].…”

“…Currently, enterprises do not apply the concept to a full extent and the results imply that they apply some of the tools included in the Six Sigma methodology only partially. In 80% of cases, they apply a Pareto chart; in 12%, they apply a bubble chart; in 4%, they apply a bar chart; and the remaining 4% apply histograms, DOEs and control charts [60]. Pursuant to the survey, the quality management system in railway undertakings is oriented to ISO standards or the European Quality Foundation Model.…”