2002
DOI: 10.1006/jasc.2001.0704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size Matters: 3-mm Sieves Do Not Increase Richness in a Fishbone Assemblage from Arrawarra I, an Aboriginal Australian Shell Midden on the Mid-north Coast of New South Wales, Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…MNI was calculated for each excavation unit, which may overestimate the MNI for the site as a whole. Fish NISP is calculated on the basis of the number of specimens identified to family or species only (Vale and Gargett 2002). Fish taxa were identified using a comparative reference collection assembled for northern New South Wales and southern Queensland and adapted for the central Queensland coast (for example, the tiger flathead, Platycephalus indicus, uncommon in New South Wales, was included).…”
Section: Vertebrate Remainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MNI was calculated for each excavation unit, which may overestimate the MNI for the site as a whole. Fish NISP is calculated on the basis of the number of specimens identified to family or species only (Vale and Gargett 2002). Fish taxa were identified using a comparative reference collection assembled for northern New South Wales and southern Queensland and adapted for the central Queensland coast (for example, the tiger flathead, Platycephalus indicus, uncommon in New South Wales, was included).…”
Section: Vertebrate Remainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are grateful for this chance to rebut Zohar and Belmaker's critique of Vale and Gargett [5]. Their paper states that our conclusions are ''.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…To begin with, the authors misinterpret the aim of Vale and Gargett [5], wrongly accuse us of naı¨vete´dor worse, backward thinkingdon the issue of diversity and, inexplicably, report that we advise against using 3-and 1-mm mesh sieves. We are certain that these errors are inadvertent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Which were searched for should have been stipulated. If the single carangid bone found by Vale and Gargett [5] in the 1-mm sieve was from one of the three species that Hutchins and Swainston [4:56-60] list as attaining sizes 30 cm or under, it could have provided evidence of a small fish species retained by a small screen. If the bone came from one of the remaining 24 species, this would not be the case.…”
Section: Methodological Flawsmentioning
confidence: 97%