Slope Stability Analysis of a Saturated Riparian Buffer: A Case Study

Dickey, Loulou C.; McEachran, Andrea R.; Rutherford, Cassandra J.; Perez, Michael A.; Rehmann, Chris R.; Isenhart, Thomas M.; Jaynes, Dan B.; Groh, Tyler A.

doi:10.1061/9780784482827.030

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, surface runoff treatment and wildlife habitat can be preserved as functions of a site for a saturated riparian buffer. Increased flow and an elevated water table can reduce the stability of a slope, but an assessment of slope stability for five SRB sites (BC‐1, IA‐1, B‐T, BC‐2, and SH) showed that four of the slopes would be stable at widths greater than 3 m (Dickey et al., 2020), a distance smaller than all of the optimal widths in Figure 3. The fifth site (BC‐2) has a factor of safety below the acceptable threshold for slope stability even without added flow.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Improving the effectiveness of saturated riparian buffers for removing nitrate from subsurface drainage

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A saturated riparian buffer (SRB) is an edge-of-field conservation practice that reduces nitrate export from agricultural lands by redistributing tile drainage as shallow groundwater and allowing for denitrification and plant uptake. We propose an approach to improve the design of SRBs by analyzing a tradeoff in choosing the SRB width, and we apply the approach to six sites with SRBs in central Iowa. A larger width allows for more residence time, which increases the opportunity for removing nitrate that enters the buffer. However, because the SRBs considered here treat only a portion of the tile flow when it is large, for the same difference in hydraulic head, a smaller width allows more of the total tile flow to enter the buffer and therefore treats more of the drainage. By maximizing the effectiveness of nitrate removal, defined as the ratio of total nitrate removed by the SRB to total nitrate leaving the field in tile drainage, an equation for the optimal width was derived in terms of soil properties, denitrification rates, and head difference. All six sites with existing SRBs considered here have optimal widths smaller than the current width, and two are below the minimum width listed in current design standards. In terms of uncertainty, the main challenges in computing the optimal width for a site are estimating the removal coefficient for nitrate and determining the saturated hydraulic conductivity. Nevertheless, including a width that accounts for site conditions in the design standards would improve water quality locally and regionally.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%