Slovenia’s navigation through a turbulent transition

Ignjatović, Miroljub; Kopač, Anja; Svetlik, Ivan; Trbanc, Martina

doi:10.46692/9781847425614.013

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Csr In the Cee And Nordic Country Context1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2013

2020

Publication Types

Select...

Book1

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent2

Authors

Journals

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…According to European-level comparative studies, Nordic HRM is more strategic, more formalized and more employee-oriented than HRM in other European countries (Vanhala, 2008). Ignjatovic & Svetlik (2003) have identified four European HRM clusters: Western, Nordic, Central Southern and Peripheral. The Nordic countries fall into the unique Nordic cluster, while the CEE countries are distributed between the Central Southern and Peripheral clusters.…”

Section: Csr In the Cee And Nordic Country Contextmentioning

confidence: 99%

CSR and Responsible HRM in the CEE and the Nordic Countries

Kazlauskaitė¹,

Ligthart²,

Bučiūnienė³

et al. 2013

Global Trends in Human Resource Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Csr In the Cee And Nordic Country Contextmentioning

confidence: 99%

CSR and Responsible HRM in the CEE and the Nordic Countries

Kazlauskaitė¹,

Ligthart²,

Bučiūnienė³

et al. 2013

Global Trends in Human Resource Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Social policy in Slovenia and Montenegro: Comparing development and challenges

Hrast

Janković

Rakar

2020

Politics in Central Europe

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Slovenia and Montenegro have a common past; however, they have also experienced diverse developments in the field of social policy over the last three decades. The social policy of the two countries is based on a Yugoslav welfare model, and yet the positions of the two countries were quite rather different even as part of Federal Yugoslavia, with Slovenia being one of the most developed territories within the federation, while Montenegro was one of the least developed. In this article, we will describe the position and main challenges of the transition of the two countries from 1990 in relation to the developments and changes in the core fields of social policy, such as the labour market and social assistance, family policy and old age policy. The emphasis will be on linking the diverse starting points, the process of transition and the direction of developments, within the framework of path dependent changes in the two welfare systems, as well as a discussion of the relevant structural pressures, such as the economic and social situation of the two countries and ways of coping with these pressures that were employed. In the conclusion, the changes within the individual fields of social policy will also be discussed in relation to the prevalent discourses of the neoliberal transformation of modern welfare states, along with the development of social investment perspectives within social policy as a whole.

show abstract

Slovenia’s navigation through a turbulent transition

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

CSR and Responsible HRM in the CEE and the Nordic Countries

CSR and Responsible HRM in the CEE and the Nordic Countries

Social policy in Slovenia and Montenegro: Comparing development and challenges

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About