Slower Consumption Reflections on Product Life Spans and the “Throwaway Society”

Abstract

SummarySustainable consumption is unlikely to be achieved as long as the quantity of household waste generated in industrial nations continues to rise. One factor underlying this trend is the life span of household goods. This article contributes to recent advances in life-cycle thinking by highlighting the significance of product life spans for sustainable consumption and exploring the current state of research. A theoretical model is developed to demonstrate how, by contributing to efficiency and sufficiency, longer product life spans may secure progress toward sustainable consumption. Empirical research undertaken in the United Kingdom on consumer attitudes and behavior relating to the life spans of household products is reviewed and factors that influence the market for longerlasting products are discussed. A need is identified for further research on product life spans and some themes are proposed.Keywords eco-efficiency life-cycle thinking obsolescence product durability product life spans sustainable consumption

Why Is Ownership an Issue? Exploring Factors That Determine Public Acceptance of Product-Service Systems

“…Another important aspect of such object-self relations is the ethics of care that accompany them (cf., [36,37] which highlight the sense of responsibility for products and second-hand exchange). The idea that individuals will take less care when using products that are accessed rather than owned is a common concern surrounding access-based consumption [19,27,32].…”

Stewardship of things: The radical potential of product stewardship for re-framing responsibilities and relationships to products and materials

“…They suggest that a conservative ethics of care was a significant part of respondents' accounts of why they participated in second hand exchange, an ethics with only tenuous connections to the environmental or social implications of buying new. Similarly, Cooper (2005) found a sense of responsibility to possessions, with respondents commonly reporting the desire that items they dispose of should go to some further good use.…”

“…Cooper (2005) reports on research with consumers on expectations and attitudes towards the longevity of household appliances, revealing issues about the effective technical life of products, but also of technical and aesthetic obsolescence. Forms of care and recognition of value are also shown through the storage in cupboards, lofts and garages of goods and materials with no immediate value, and often with no prospect of future use.…”

Green marketing as a strategic tool for the sustainable development of less favoured areas of Greece: women's agro-tourism cooperatives

“…In business, sustainability has been defined as "the consumption of goods and services that meet basic needs and quality of life without jeopardising the needs of future generations" (OECD, 2002). As Cooper (2005) indicates, this may be interpreted in a number of ways, but principally sustainability is about limiting the throughput of resources, while making the best use of those resources available (Gordon, Carrigan and Hastings, 2011). While it is broadly accepted that sustainable development relies on three distinct pillars: economic growth, environment protection and social progress (e.g., Figge et al, 2002;Pope et al, 2004;Gibson, 2006;Murphy, 2012), most researchers dwell on the economy pillar and short-term economic benefits (Drexhage and Murphy, 2010).…”