2022
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.881353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small and Medium-Sized Aneurysm Outcomes Following Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment Using the Pipeline Embolization Device: A Subgroup Analysis of the PLUS Registry

Abstract: ObjectiveThe purpose of this work was to summarize the real-world safety and efficacy of Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) therapy for small and medium-sized intracranial aneurysms in China.MethodsPatients from the PED in China post-market multi-center registry study (PLUS) with aneurysms smaller than 12 mm were selected. Radiographic outcomes were assessed using digital subtraction angiography. Clinical outcomes included functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale, MRS) in the early postoperative period ( ≤ 3… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PREMIER study is the first prospective multicenter study to evaluate the use of flow diverters in small/medium, unruptured intracranial aneurysms, which suggests that treatment with the flow-diverting pipeline embolization device is safe and efficacious for small aneurysms, with complication rates comparable with those for traditional endovascular techniques ( 3 ). Another real-world study about the safety and efficacy of the pipeline embolization device for small/medium intracranial aneurysms in China also demonstrated high surgical success rates, high occlusion rates, and low morbidity and mortality ( 4 ). Therefore, the indication of flow diversion is extended to small and medium aneurysms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PREMIER study is the first prospective multicenter study to evaluate the use of flow diverters in small/medium, unruptured intracranial aneurysms, which suggests that treatment with the flow-diverting pipeline embolization device is safe and efficacious for small aneurysms, with complication rates comparable with those for traditional endovascular techniques ( 3 ). Another real-world study about the safety and efficacy of the pipeline embolization device for small/medium intracranial aneurysms in China also demonstrated high surgical success rates, high occlusion rates, and low morbidity and mortality ( 4 ). Therefore, the indication of flow diversion is extended to small and medium aneurysms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With continuous progress in endovascular treatment technology and concept, as well as rapid development in new materials and equipment, endovascular treatment technology has been widely used in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Compared with surgical clipping, interventional embolization of aneurysms has the advantages of less trauma, faster recovery, and lower surgical risk, and has been accepted by the majority of patients as one of the first choices for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms ( 25 , 27 31 ). However, the recurrence rate was significantly higher than that of surgical clipping ( 2 , 19 – 21 ), with the recurrent ruptured hemorrhage of embolized aneurysms characterized by high mortality and disability, requiring repeated endovascular embolization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the treatment of the anterior circulation, PED has demonstrated a good therapeutic effect. 6,7 Nowadays, the use of PED in posterior circulation aneurysms is gradually increasing. However, the proportion of nonsaccular aneurysms in the posterior circulation and the risk of aneurysm rupture were higher, 1,2 and the clinical grade at the time of rupture was poor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 Flow diversion devices have achieved good results in the treatment of anterior circulation and have become a common treatment method for intracranial aneurysms . 6,7 Currently, there are more and more cases of PED off-label treatment for posterior circulation aneurysms. However, endovascular treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms has more complications than anterior circulation aneurysms, 8 so the selection of appropriate treatment segments is crucial.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%