2002
DOI: 10.1006/icar.2002.6902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small Main-Belt Asteroid Spectroscopic Survey in the Near-Infrared

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
71
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The diameter estimated from the absolute magnitude (13.18), assuming an albedo value of 0.2, is between 8-10 km. Comparing the spectral behavior of Litva with that of 9 A-type asteroids reported by Burbine & Binzel (2002), it appears that Litva has a higher abundance of olivine as compared to other small-sized A-type asteroids.…”
Section: Litvamentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The diameter estimated from the absolute magnitude (13.18), assuming an albedo value of 0.2, is between 8-10 km. Comparing the spectral behavior of Litva with that of 9 A-type asteroids reported by Burbine & Binzel (2002), it appears that Litva has a higher abundance of olivine as compared to other small-sized A-type asteroids.…”
Section: Litvamentioning
confidence: 76%
“…However, ordinary chondrites and HED achondrites exhibit deep absorption bands of mafic silicates in the near-infrared, while Lutetia is relatively featureless in that spectral range (Howell et al 1994;Burbine & Binzel 2002;Birlan et al 2004Birlan et al , 2006Nedelcu et al 2007). Among meteorites with relatively featureless NIR spectra, a broad inflection mentioned above is present in the spectra of some chondrites of CR clan (including CH) and ureilites.…”
Section: Observations Data Reduction and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lazzaro et al (2004) also determined an X-classification for Lutetia. Howell et al (1994) and Burbine & Binzel (2002) observed Lutetia in the near-infrared and found that it has an unusual flat spectrum compared to other M-type asteroids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, the most fundamental distinction would be between objects of classes belonging to the S-complex (Bus & Binzel 2002) and those classified in the C-or X-complexes (Bus & Binzel 2002), which also have low geometric albedos. The S-complex asteroids, whose spectra is dominated in the visible by olivine/pyroxene bands, in general should have mineralogies compatible with the anhydrous and poorly hydrated chondrites, i.e., OCs and CO/CVs, as well as several products of differentiation (Britt et al 1992;Burbine & Binzel 2002;Mothe-Diniz et al 2008). The best mineralogical analogues for objects with low albedo classified in the C-/X-complexes are the hydrated carbonaceous chondrites CM and CI (Vilas & Gaffey 1989;Carvano et al 2003) Members of these complexes with higher albedos, on the other hand, can be compatible with differentiation products as enstatite achondrites and metallic meteorites, as well as with enstatite chondrites.…”
Section: Distribution Of Taxonomiesmentioning
confidence: 99%