1992
DOI: 10.2307/2845503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small-Scale Heterogeneity in the Spatial Distribution of Carabid Beetles in the Southern Finnish Taiga

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
142
3
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
12
142
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In effect, previous studies have showed that the microhabitat is a determinant factor for carabid beetle diversity and community composition (e.g. Betbeder et al, 2015;Koivula et al, 1999;Kotze et al, 2011;Niemelä et al, 1992;Schirmel et al, 2015). Here we found that carabid abundance and species richness were higher in spots with denser vegetation cover (plot scale).…”
Section: Effects Of Environmental Factors On Carabid Diversitysupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In effect, previous studies have showed that the microhabitat is a determinant factor for carabid beetle diversity and community composition (e.g. Betbeder et al, 2015;Koivula et al, 1999;Kotze et al, 2011;Niemelä et al, 1992;Schirmel et al, 2015). Here we found that carabid abundance and species richness were higher in spots with denser vegetation cover (plot scale).…”
Section: Effects Of Environmental Factors On Carabid Diversitysupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Thus, a higher number of poorer dispersers preferred the sheltered habitat conditions promoted by thicker spots of herbaceous plants at the fine plot scale. Previous studies showed that active microhabitat selection explains carabid species distributions at the small scale within the study areas (Koivula et al, 1999;Kotze et al, 2011;Niemelä et al, 1992). Different species characteristics and species interactions may underlie such species distributions and community structuring at local spatial scales (Koivula et al, 1999), as a result of niche partitioning and species tradeoffs (Driscoll, 2008).…”
Section: Effects Of Management and Environmental Features On Carabid mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clustered spatial patterns, as observed for Mg. guerinii, have been reported for many forest carabids (Dennison & Hodkinson 1984;Weseloh 1987;Grüm 1990;Niemelä et al 1992;Loreau & Nolf 1994). This aggregation has been attributable to specific habitat associations in some studies but not in others.…”
Section: Spatial Distributions and Habitat Associationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Leaf litter was shown to increase the number of carabid species through producing favourable microsites (Niemelä et al 1992, Niemelä and. Leaf-litter can offer more stable temperature and humidity conditions which are important factors determining the spatial pattern of forest carabids (Thiele 1977).…”
Section: Carabids and Environmental Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was a strong positive relationship between the number of obligate forest species and the cover of leaf litter. Leaf litter, through producing more stable temperature and humidity conditions, is a very important factor for obligate forest species which prefer cool and wet microsites (Thiele 1977, Niemelä et al 1992.…”
Section: Carabids and Environmental Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%