Smart City and High-Tech Urban Interventions Targeting Human Health: An Equity-Focused Systematic Review

Abstract

Urban infrastructure systems responsible for the provision of energy, transportation, shelter, and communication to populations are important determinants of health and health equity. The term “smart city” has been used synonymously with other terms, such as “digital city”, “sustainable city”, and “information city”, even though definitional distinctions exist between terms. In this review, we use “smart cities” as a catch-all term to refer to an emerging concept in urban governance practice and scholarship that has been increasingly applied to achieve public health aims. The objective of this systematic review was to document and analyze the inclusion of equity considerations and dimensions (i.e., a measurement, analytical, or dialectical focus on systematic disparities in health between groups) in smart city interventions aimed to improve human health and well-being. Systematic searches were carried out in the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Psychological Information Database (PsycINFO), the PubMed database from the National Center for Biotechnology Information, Elsevier’s database Scopus, and Web of Science, returning 3219 titles. Ultimately, 28 articles were retained, assessed, and coded for their inclusion of equity characteristics using the Cochrane PROGRESS-Plus tool (referring to (P) place of residence, (R) race, (O) occupation, (G) gender, (R) religion, (E) education, (S) socio-economic status (SES), and (S) social capital). The most frequently included equity considerations in smart city health interventions were place of residence, SES, social capital, and personal characteristics; conversely, occupation, gender or sex, religion, race, ethnicity, culture, language, and education characteristics were comparatively less featured in such interventions. Overall, it appears that most of intervention evaluations assessed in this review are still in the early testing phases, and thus did not include or feature robust evaluative designs or commercially available technologies

The Transition of Cities towards Innovations in Mobility: Searching for a Global Perspective

“…We must remember that INN is linked to the way in which a city takes advantage of local talent and resources to drive technological advances. This definition is in line with those who indicate that the smart city must suppose an incorporation of the human capital variable with the relevance that has already been given to technological elements in the definition of the smart city [ 5 , 6 , 21 , 22 ]. Likewise, the advances in INN must be reflected in the achievement of SDG11.…”

“…Infrastructure comprises durable assets that define the physical configuration of mobility systems [ 20 ]. Infrastructure provides a solution to the problems arising from massive urbanization [ 21 , 31 ] and ultimately determines the health of cities [ 22 ]. The reinforcement of infrastructure is essential to determining the level of readiness for smart city transformation [ 1 , 27 , 31 , 44 , 49 , 50 ].…”

“…For this reason, cities around the world demonstrate the need to transform their urban mobility systems into more sustainable ones [ 20 ]. While the traditional approach to the smart city focuses on the provision of services through technologies, a later approach aligned with the SDGs is not only committed to developing a smart city that helps to define and solve social challenges, but also to increasing the well-being of citizens and meet their needs through a flexible and efficient conception that incorporates the human capital variable [ 5 , 6 , 21 , 22 ]. In fact, the smart city offers citizens a good environment to live in and increases their quality of life.…”

Smart Cities Landscape and Urban Planning for Sustainability in Brno City

“…Other studies indicate that urban infrastructures are developed to provide essential services vital to health and sustainability [34]. In this regard, smart cities rely on governance that adopts practices to increase residents' welfare and sustainable development aims [35,36].…”

Association of Urban Liveability with Cancer Incidence in Iran: A Nationwide Ecological Study

“…These risks are inequitably distributed in cities and, usually, the low socioeconomic groups have the highest exposure and worst prognosis. Researchers believe that cities produce systematic health inequities based on social status (14).…”