Smart kampung: doing cultural studies in the Global South

Budianta, Melani

doi:10.1080/14791420.2019.1650194

Cited by 9 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…However, a unique insight that transpired from the stories shared by young people without disabilities in Study 1 was that the other person’s perceived availability of resources played a bigger role than disability status in many of their interactions. Although this might appear surprising in light of the strong cultural and religious beliefs of many participants, it is not unexpected, as youth in the Global South often live under the threat of poverty and are heavily subjected to neoliberal and capitalistic narratives that reinforce this transactional mentality [ 67 , 68 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“When They See a Wheelchair, They’ve Not Even Seen Me”—Factors Shaping the Experience of Disability Stigma and Discrimination in Kenya

Barbareschi

Carew

Johnson

et al. 2021

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Disability stigma in many low- and middle-income countries represents one of the most pervasive barriers preventing people with disabilities from accessing equal rights and opportunities, including the uptake of available assistive technology (AT). Previous studies have rarely examined how disability stigma may be shaped through factors endemic to social interactions, including how the use of assistive technology itself may precipitate or alleviate disability stigma. Through two strands of work, we address this gap. Via a series of focus groups with Kenyans without disabilities (Study 1) and secondary data analysis of consultations with Kenyans with disabilities and their allies (Study 2), we identify shared and divergent understandings of what shapes disability stigma and discrimination. Specifically, Kenyans with and without disabilities were cognizant of how religious/spiritual interpretations of disability, conceptions of impairments as “different” from the norm, and social stereotypes about (dis)ability shaped the experience of stigma and discrimination. Moreover, both groups highlighted assistive technology as an influential factor that served to identify or “mark” someone as having a disability. However, whereas participants without disabilities saw assistive technology purely as an enabler to overcome stigma, participants with disabilities also noted that, in some cases, use of assistive technologies would attract stigma from others.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“When They See a Wheelchair, They’ve Not Even Seen Me”—Factors Shaping the Experience of Disability Stigma and Discrimination in Kenya

Barbareschi

Carew

Johnson

et al. 2021

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Gotong-royong was coined by Soekarno, the first President of Indonesia. It has been used since the pre-independence era and labeled as a national character that is the opposite of the individualistic character from the West (Budianta, 2019).…”

Section: Perspectivization Contextualization Of the Cultural Practicementioning

confidence: 99%

Positive Discourse Analysis of the Indonesian Government Spokesperson's Discursive Strategies during the Covid-19 Pandemic

Sultan

Rapi

2020

gema

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Covid-19 pandemic that is sweeping across the globe has caused increased anxiety. Studies in linguistics have found a variety of language expressions that convey people's anxiety and fear. However, there are only a few researchers that studied the use of language used in communication by the government, to enhance the citizens' morale and help them recover from psychological distress from the Covid-19 pandemic. This study focused on investigating the discursive strategies used by the Indonesian government spokesperson at daily press conferences during the Covid-19 pandemic. This study employed the Positive Discourse Analysis (PDA) framework. A total of 28 recorded press conference sessions that lasted between 25-45 minutes were analyzed through the identification, interpretation, and explanation stages. Identification was carried out through careful reading of the transcription of the government spokesperson's speech to find out the discursive strategy used by the spokesperson. The interpretation was done by grouping similar quotes with the same themes, based on the context of the discourse. The explanation was done by explaining, in a macro way, the situational aspects and social contexts that provide the background for the texts' production and relating them to the pandemic. The results of the study showed that the spokesperson made use of nomination, predication, argumentation, perspectivization and intensification, and mitigation strategies to deliver information to the public. The entire discursive strategies are used to improve the public's optimism and build solidarity of the citizens as a moral force to face the pandemic. Suggestions for future research about analysis of pandemic discourse employed by the government include corpus analysis, power representation and framing.

show abstract

“…Shirleyana et al (2018) mengatakan bahwasanya nama kampung berasal dari terjemahan harafiah (toponim) dari pendudukan penduduk kampung. Penduduk kota menggunakan istilah pulang atau balik kampung dengan nuansa nostalgia yang berarti tindakan kembali ke desa asal mereka, menunjukkan sejarah migrasi kota dan ikatan dengan desa pedesaan (Budianta, 2019).…”

Section: Local Wisdom Penjenjangan Permukiman Tradisional DI Indonesiaunclassified

Tipologi Permukiman Di Indonesia: Penjejangan, Dikotomi, Konteks Sosial Dan Spasial

Faisal

Ikaputra

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Jenjang permukiman di Indonesia memiliki keberagaman yang mengacu kepada istilah lokal. Generalisasi terjadi ketika sebuah organisasi yang disebut negara berdiri dengan undang-undang yang mengatur penamaan hierarki tersebut. Tulisan ini mencoba melihat bagaimana teori hierarki permukiman secara umum dalam konteks global menjadi dasar dalam pengelompokan jenjang permukiman yang ada di Indonesia. Mixed-methods systematic review digunakan sebagai metodologi penelitian, dengan mengumpulkan dan mengevaluasi penelitian yang berfokus pada hierarki permukiman. Diawali dengan menetapkan tujuan penelitian berserta tipe evidence; dilanjutkan dengan pencarian literatur berdasarkan kategori yang ditetapkan; Selanjutnya penilaian studi; dan mengelompokkan temuan tersebut; dan diakhiri dengan menetapkan dan menyimpulkan temuan sebagai koteks atau hasil ulasan. Hasil penelitian ini berupa pen-tipe-an hierarki pemrukiman tradisional yaitu; Tipe pertama disebut kelompok pertanian, kelompok ini terbentuk dalam konteks kegiatan bertahan hidup dengan keluarga inti; Tipe kedua disebut kelompok bermukim; sebagai upaya menjaga tradisi dan kebudayaan dalam satu kekerabatan; Tipe ketiga berupa kumpulan kelompok bermukim (kelompok suku) yang berdasarkan pada satu garis keturunan yang lebih jauh; Tipe keempat disebut kumpulan kelompok suku (kelompok adat), kumpulan dari kampung atau persukuan tadi membentuk hierarki yang lebih tinggi; Sedangkan Tipe berikutnya di atas kampung jenjang tersebut mulai samar, karena tidak banyak daerah yang memiliki hierarki yang di atas kampung.TYPOLOGY OF SETTLEMENT IN INDONESIA: HIERARCHY, DICHOTOMY, SOCIAL CONTEXT, AND SPATIALThe hierarchy of settlement in Indonesia has a diversity that refers to local terms. Generalization occurs when an organization called a state exists with laws governing the establishment of the hierarchy. This paper tries to see how the general settlement hierarchy theory in a global context becomes the basis for classifying settlement levels in Indonesia. The mixed-methods systematic review is used as a research methodology by collecting and evaluating research focusing on settlement hierarchies. Beginning with determining the research objectives along with the type of evidence; followed by a literature search based on the defined category; Further assessment studies; grouping the findings, and ending by establishing and concluding the findings as to the context or results of the review. The results of this study are in the form of typing the traditional settlement hierarchy; namely, The first type is called the agricultural group. This group is formed in the context of survival activities with the nuclear family. The second type is called a resident group as an effort to maintain tradition and culture in one kinship. The third type is a collection of settled groups (tribal groups) based on a more distant lineage. The fourth type is called a collection of tribal groups (customary groups), where the collection of villages or tribes forms a higher hierarchy. The next type above the village level is starting to be vague because not many areas have an order above the village.

show abstract

Smart kampung: doing cultural studies in the Global South

Cited by 9 publications

References 0 publications

“When They See a Wheelchair, They’ve Not Even Seen Me”—Factors Shaping the Experience of Disability Stigma and Discrimination in Kenya

“When They See a Wheelchair, They’ve Not Even Seen Me”—Factors Shaping the Experience of Disability Stigma and Discrimination in Kenya

Positive Discourse Analysis of the Indonesian Government Spokesperson's Discursive Strategies during the Covid-19 Pandemic

Tipologi Permukiman Di Indonesia: Penjejangan, Dikotomi, Konteks Sosial Dan Spasial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About