Smartphone Application Versus Pedometer to Promote Physical Activity in Prostate Cancer Patients

Lee, Byung‐Joo; Park, Yong Hyun; Lee, Ji Youl; Kim, Soo Jin; Jang, Yong Suk; Lee, Jong In

doi:10.1089/tmj.2018.0233

Cited by 34 publications

(70 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Our systematic review identified a discrete number of specific papers mainly analyzing various aspects of the management of PCa and UI, which are two of the most prevalent conditions. Moreover, the methodological quality of the reports was also good, including 12 reports from 11 RCTs [12,17,18,22,[25][26][27]33,34,38,44,48] and a large number of prospective studies. The data of the available literature seem to indicate that telehealth has been implemented successfully in several common clinical scenarios, including the decision-making process following the diagnosis of nonmetastatic PCa, follow-up care of patients with localized PCa who received curative treatments, initial diagnosis of hematuria, diagnosis and follow-up care of uncomplicated urinary stones and uncomplicated UTIs, initial evaluation of patients with UI, administration of both behavioral therapies and PFMT, and follow-up care after surgical treatments of SUI or pelvic organ prolapse.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Table 1 summarizes the studies evaluating the application of telehealth interventions to PCa management. Among the 11 studies that reported data on application of telehealth in PCa [17,20,26,30,34,35,37,39,42,45,48], there were four RCTs [17,26,34,48], two nonrandomized comparative studies [20,37], and five case series [30,35,39,42,45].…”

Section: Prostate Cancermentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Lee et al [48] randomized 100 patients with PCa to smartphone-based and conventional pedometer-based exercise monitoring systems in promoting home exercise. The smartphone app was used to record physical activities versus the standard written report.…”

Section: Studies On Patients' Mixed Stages and Therapiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Eleven studies reported data on the application of telehealth in prostate cancer (PCa) [17,20,26,30,34,35,37,39,42,45,48], three studies in the diagnosis of patients with hematuria [31,40,43], six studies in the management of urinary stone disease [9][10][11]44,46,47], 14 studies in the management of urinary incontinence (UI) [12,22,23,25,27,28,32,33,36,38,[49][50][51] five studies in urinary tract infections (UTIs) [15,16,19,21,53], and six studies in other urological conditions [11,14,18,24,41]; 12 reports were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) [12,17,18,22,[25]…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Telehealth in Urology: A Systematic Review of the Literature. How Much Can Telemedicine Be Useful During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic?

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Context: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused increased interest in the application of telehealth to provide care without exposing patients and physicians to the risk of contagion. The urological literature on the topic is sparse. Objective: To perform a systematic review of the literature and evaluate all the available studies on urological applications of telehealth. Evidence acquisition: After registration on PROSPERO, we searched PubMed and Scopus databases to collect any kind of studies evaluating any telehealth interventions in any urological conditions. The National Toxicology Program/Office of Health Assessment and Translation Risk of Bias Rating Tool for Human and Animal Studies was used to estimate the risk of bias. A narrative synthesis was performed. Evidence synthesis: We identified 45 studies (11 concerning prostate cancer [PCa], three hematuria management, six urinary stones, 14 urinary incontinence [UI], five urinary tract infections [UTIs], and six other conditions), including 12 randomized controlled trials. The available literature indicates that telemedicine has been implemented successfully in several common clinical scenarios, including the decision-making process following a diagnosis of nonmetastatic PCa, follow-up care of patients with localized PCa after curative treatments, initial diagnosis of hematuria, management diagnosis and follow-up care of uncomplicated urinary stones and uncomplicated UTIs, and initial evaluation, behavioral therapies, and pelvic floor muscle training in UI patients, as well

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Prostate Cancermentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Studies On Patients' Mixed Stages and Therapiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Telehealth in Urology: A Systematic Review of the Literature. How Much Can Telemedicine Be Useful During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic?

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Lange et al [23] offered some cautionary data demonstrating poorer psychological outcomes for patients utilising an online peer chat group compared with usual care. A number of other studies have assessed the feasibility of behavioural interventions (predominantly in activity/exercise engagement) in patients with prostate cancer [24] , [25] . Taken together, these studies demonstrate that remote virtual care can feasibly replace part (but not all) of in-person clinician interactions.…”

Section: Evidence Synthesismentioning

confidence: 99%

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Genitourinary Cancer Care: Re-envisioning the Future

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Context The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic necessitated rapid changes in medical practice. Many of these changes may add value to care, creating opportunities going forward. Objective To provide an evidence-informed, expert-derived review of genitourinary cancer care moving forward following the initial COVID-19 pandemic. Evidence acquisition A collaborative narrative review was conducted using literature published through May 2020 (PubMed), which comprised three main topics: reduced in-person interactions arguing for increasing virtual and image-based care, optimisation of the delivery of care, and the effect of COVID-19 in health care facilities on decision-making by patients and their families. Evidence synthesis Patterns of care will evolve following the COVID-19 pandemic. Telemedicine, virtual care, and telemonitoring will increase and could offer broader access to multidisciplinary expertise without increasing costs. Comprehensive and integrative telehealth solutions will be necessary, and should consider patients’ mental health and access differences due to socioeconomic status. Investigations and treatments will need to maximise efficiency and minimise health care interactions. Solutions such as one stop clinics, day case surgery, hypofractionated radiotherapy, and oral or less frequent drug dosing will be preferred. The pandemic necessitated a triage of those patients whose treatment should be expedited, delayed, or avoided, and may persist with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) in circulation. Patients whose demographic characteristics are at the highest risk of complications from COVID-19 may re-evaluate the benefit of intervention for less aggressive cancers. Clinical research will need to accommodate virtual care and trial participation. Research dissemination and medical education will increasingly utilise virtual platforms, limiting in-person professional engagement; ensure data dissemination; and aim to enhance patient engagement. Conclusions The COVID-19 pandemic will have lasting effects on the delivery of health care. These changes offer opportunities to improve access, delivery, and the value of care for patients with genitourinary cancers but raise concerns that physicians and health administrators must consider in order to ensure equitable access to care. Patient summary The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has dramatically changed the care provided to many patients with genitourinary cancers. This has necessitated a transition to telemedicine, changes in threshold or delays in many treatments, and an opportunity to reimagine patient care to maintain safety and improve value moving forward.

show abstract

Integrative review of remote patient monitoring in gynecologic and urologic surgical oncology

Pérez

Nolde

Crane

et al. 2023

Journal of Surgical Oncology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Patients with cancer facing complex and invasive urologic and gynecologic cancer surgery often experience symptoms and rapid declines in functional capacity postoperatively. Remote patient monitoring that leverages patient‐generated health data is a potential approach to assess and promote postoperative recovery. This integrative review aims to provide an overview of the current literature and research on remote patient monitoring in gynecologic and urologic surgical oncology.

show abstract

Smartphone Application Versus Pedometer to Promote Physical Activity in Prostate Cancer Patients

Cited by 34 publications

References 19 publications

Telehealth in Urology: A Systematic Review of the Literature. How Much Can Telemedicine Be Useful During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic?

Telehealth in Urology: A Systematic Review of the Literature. How Much Can Telemedicine Be Useful During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic?

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Genitourinary Cancer Care: Re-envisioning the Future

Integrative review of remote patient monitoring in gynecologic and urologic surgical oncology

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About