2023
DOI: 10.21468/scipostphys.15.5.185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SModelS v2.3: Enabling global likelihood analyses

Mohammad Mahdi Altakach,
Sabine Kraml,
Andre Lessa
et al.

Abstract: We present version 2.3 of SModelS, a public tool for the fast reinterpretation of LHC searches for new physics on the basis of simplified-model results. The main new features are a database update with the latest available experimental results for full Run 2 luminosity, comprising in particular a large variety of electroweak-ino searches, and the ability to combine likelihoods from different analyses. This enables statistically more rigorous constraints and opens the way for global likelihood analyses for LHC … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 140 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we give an overview of the experimental results in the SMODELS v2.3 [14] database that enter our study. In particular, we explain which material is provided by the experimental collaborations and how it is used in SMODELS.…”
Section: Relevant Analyses In the Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In this section, we give an overview of the experimental results in the SMODELS v2.3 [14] database that enter our study. In particular, we explain which material is provided by the experimental collaborations and how it is used in SMODELS.…”
Section: Relevant Analyses In the Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 → (h χ0 1 )(h χ0 1 ) simplified model on HEPDATA [70], which we implemented in the SMODELS database. Since the reported uncertainties are asymmetric, the SLv2 (Gaussian with a skew) [14,47] approach is used for SR combination. The necessity of going beyond the Gaussian approximation for this analysis was discussed in detail in [71].…”
Section: Cms-sus-16-048 [45]mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations