Applied Urban Ecology 2011
DOI: 10.1002/9781444345025.ch10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Aspects of Urban Ecology in Developing Countries, with an Emphasis on Urban Domestic Gardens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to the claim that domestic gardens have been ignored in urban ecological studies (Cilliers et al, 2011), we found that, in terms of ecosystem services, they were only marginally less frequently examined than parks. Private property owners can significantly influence the ecological structures of an urban area and private gardens can be a useful instrument to increase ecosystem services, independent from central planning and trade-offs inherent in public spaces (Van Heezik et al, 2012).…”
Section: Ecological Structurescontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to the claim that domestic gardens have been ignored in urban ecological studies (Cilliers et al, 2011), we found that, in terms of ecosystem services, they were only marginally less frequently examined than parks. Private property owners can significantly influence the ecological structures of an urban area and private gardens can be a useful instrument to increase ecosystem services, independent from central planning and trade-offs inherent in public spaces (Van Heezik et al, 2012).…”
Section: Ecological Structurescontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Such an approach may be very useful not only for understanding the underlying motivations for variation of green infrastructure at the household scale (Marco et al 2010, Cook et al 2012), but also for understanding which factors may limit or facilitate the transition of yard management toward sustainable practices. Urban biodiversity studies indicate that variation in socioeconomic factors, which we have used to refer to social, demographic, and economic criteria, are important drivers of variation in residential green infrastructure in cities (Cilliers et al 2012 and references therein). These studies have generated a variety of competing theories and generalizations about which socioeconomic factors are most important at generating urban vegetation variation and under what circumstances (Kendal et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But this view is quickly changing (Shackleton et al 2008, Goddard et al 2009). The benefits of residential vegetation may be variable, in terms of providing ecosystem services such as food supplies, mitigation of urban heat island and urban fragmentation effects, runoff reduction, and above-ground carbon storage; as well, residential vegetation may have positive effects on the quality of human life, health, and well-being (Dunnett and Qasim 2000, Town and Country Planning Association 2004, Williams et al 2009, Cilliers et al 2011, Davies et al 2011, Cameron et al 2012. In some areas, the structural diversity of the vegetation in residential yards can be a good predictor of biological diversity in the urban environment (MĂŒller et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%