Social control and solidarity during the COVID‐19 pandemic: The direct and indirect effects of causal attribution of insufficient compliance through perceived anomie

Abstract

The COVID‐19 pandemic is a crisis which called for two crucial modes of social regulation: social control and social solidarity . In the present pre‐registered study, we examine how the perceived non‐compliance with health measures relates to attitudes towards these modes of social regulation, as well as to the role played by the perception of disintegrated and disregulated society ( anomie ). Using data from an online cross‐sectional survey conducted in Belgium in April 2020 ( N = 717), results show that the causal attribution of the crisis to insufficient compliance was differentially associated with support for social control and social solidarity behaviours. Specifically, greater attribution to insufficient compliance was associated with a perceived breakdown in the social fabric (disintegration), which explained stronger support for social control and fewer solidarity‐based actions. Perceived disregulation, conversely, was associated with less support for social control and more support for social solidarity. Therefore, the perception of the pandemic and associated perceived anomie tend to polarize citizens' attitudes towards these two modes of social regulation. In this way, prosocial behaviours might be inhibited by communications that attribute the pandemic's causes to incivility. Other implications of our findings for the social psychological literature on communities' reactions to the pandemic are discussed. Please refer to the Supplementary Material section to find this article's Community and Social Impact Statement .

Narrative incongruence in pandemic local governance: Mayors perform responsibility as communities demand responsiveness

“…From this perspective, local issues also call for reconfiguring social psychological guidance tailored for Western contexts, as in the case of public responses to policing (Prosser et al, 2020; Roblaine et al, 2022). Recognizing the public's agency and aligning with their needs remain vital (Drury et al, 2020).…”

Spatiotemporal Mapping of Online Interest in Cannabis and Popular Psychedelics before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Poland

“…Some may try to take advantage of the new circumstances to profit from trading rare goods. The pandemic, particularly the experiences and behaviors that accompany it, has led to the disintegration of existing rules within society while introducing new rules necessary to achieve new goals: survival, avoidance of infection, and maintenance of social order [ 50 , 51 ]. Concerning responses to anomie, we hypothesized that specific individuals might be more interested in searching web-based information concerning psychedelics, including teenagers and young college students, because actual drug use is a behavior frequently seen among adolescents and young adults per the World Drug Report [ 25 ].…”

Perceived coercion, perceived pressures and procedural justice arising from global lockdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review

“…A sense of social responsibility and civic duty was not exclusive to these South-East Asian studies and was also noted in Australia and some European countries [32,35,39]. In one study, individuals who linked the spread of COVID-19 to insufficient compliance with restrictive measures by others tended to favour greater pandemic-related social control [40]. Yet, where members of the general public and government officials were seen to not obey those restrictions, for instance in the UK, the public too felt less pressured and inclined to do so [35].…”