“…Though surgical intervention was largely preferred for many years, minimally invasive treatments have grown in popularity due to their favorable outcomes, fast recovery times, low overhead, and accessibility [2]. To empirically capture the shift in interest from surgical to minimally invasive gluteal augmentation, a five-year retrospective analysis of Google Trends relative search volume (RSV) was conducted, as many Google Trend studies have demonstrated the relationship between internet search volume and procedural participation [20][21][22][23][24]. Our analysis demonstrates a shifting interest from surgical gluteal augmentation ('butt surgery') to injectable augmentation ('butt filler') (Figure 2).…”