2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2010.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social imaginaries and Big History: Towards a new planetary consciousness?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study aims to do this by testing the interplay between design methods such as speculative design and foresight methods such as scenario explorations, in the context of the Multi-Level Perspective systems change framework. A series of preliminary workshops designed and facilitated by the authors suggest an opportunity for extended research in the role of design methods for creating future imaginaries (Patomäki & Steger, 2010) and backcasting present actions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study aims to do this by testing the interplay between design methods such as speculative design and foresight methods such as scenario explorations, in the context of the Multi-Level Perspective systems change framework. A series of preliminary workshops designed and facilitated by the authors suggest an opportunity for extended research in the role of design methods for creating future imaginaries (Patomäki & Steger, 2010) and backcasting present actions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study aims to do this by bringing together design methods such as speculative design and foresight methods such as scenario explorations in order to cultivate prospective thinking that can hold multiple alternative lenses, or future worlds. A series of preliminary workshops designed and facilitated by the authors (Angheloiu, Chaudhuri & Sheldrick 2017) suggest an opportunity for extended research in the role of design methods for creating future imaginaries (Patomäki & Steger 2010) and backcasting present actions.…”
Section: Design and Discussion Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This mobilization occurs in terms of frames, categories, metaphors and myths that have been sedimented into the deep structures of national and religious imaginaries (cf. Patomäki and Steger 2010), from where they are again being drawn, also out of anxiety and for various strategic purposes.…”
Section: The Final Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%