2024
DOI: 10.3390/ijms25021041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Interaction in Adolescent Rats with Neonatal Ethanol Exposure: Impact of Sex and CE-123, a Selective Dopamine Reuptake Inhibitor

Justyna Socha,
Pawel Grochecki,
Irena Smaga
et al.

Abstract: Children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASDs) demonstrate deficits in social functioning that contribute to early withdrawal from school and delinquency, as well as the development of anxiety and depression. Dopamine is involved in reward, motivation, and social behavior. Thus, we evaluated whether neonatal ethanol exposure (in an animal model of FASDs) has an impact on social recognition memory using the three-chamber social novelty discrimination test during early and middle adolescence in male and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
(130 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the long-term administration of CE-123 prevented the development of these social impairments. CE-123 in the hippocampus of adolescent rats improved BDNF levels and lowered TrkB receptor expression in ethanolexposed animals, indicating enhanced neuroplasticity during development [114].…”
Section: Ce-123mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, the long-term administration of CE-123 prevented the development of these social impairments. CE-123 in the hippocampus of adolescent rats improved BDNF levels and lowered TrkB receptor expression in ethanolexposed animals, indicating enhanced neuroplasticity during development [114].…”
Section: Ce-123mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The animals were acclimated to the apparatus for 30 min before each session of the NOR task. The NOR task consisted of three sessions: (1) habituation, followed by (2) a training session lasting 5 min, and (3) a testing session also lasting 5 min, with a 30 min interval between the training and testing sessions [ 104 , 105 , 106 ]. During the training session, two identical objects were positioned in diagonal corners of the box.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%