2022
DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/zcg4x
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Mobility as Causal Intervention

Abstract: The study of mobility effects is an important subject of study for sociologists. Empirical investigations of individual mobility effects, however, have been hindered by one fundamental limitation, the unidentifiability of mobility effects when origin and destination are held constant. Given this fundamental limitation, we propose to reconceptualize mobility effects from the micro to the macro level. Instead of micro-level mobility effects, the primary focus of the past literature, we ask alternative research … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 67 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary limitation of the current study is that the analyses are cross-sectional, and causal relationships cannot be assessed. Indeed, any causal effect of intergenerational social mobility would be difficult to establish, as there is no counterfactual understanding of mobility effects ( Wei & Xie, 2022 ). When comparing individuals with the same origin and destination SEP, mobility can only go in one direction, a world in which it would go into a different direction is not conceivable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary limitation of the current study is that the analyses are cross-sectional, and causal relationships cannot be assessed. Indeed, any causal effect of intergenerational social mobility would be difficult to establish, as there is no counterfactual understanding of mobility effects ( Wei & Xie, 2022 ). When comparing individuals with the same origin and destination SEP, mobility can only go in one direction, a world in which it would go into a different direction is not conceivable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%