2012
DOI: 10.1002/9781118443132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Network Analysis in Construction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
129
0
11

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
129
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Project management represents an eclectic group of functions brought together to facilitate the delivery of a project. These functions, such as design management, cost management, instructions and incentives, among others, provide a classification of networks that support a given project (Pryke, 2012). The tendency towards archaic models of projects and their management has led the construction industry into a position where vitally important project functions, such as problem-solving is not procured, and hence, this fundamentally important aspect of the design and execution of projects is essentially self-organised (Pryke, et al 2017).…”
Section: Exploration Of the Effectiveness Or Otherwise Of Relationshimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Project management represents an eclectic group of functions brought together to facilitate the delivery of a project. These functions, such as design management, cost management, instructions and incentives, among others, provide a classification of networks that support a given project (Pryke, 2012). The tendency towards archaic models of projects and their management has led the construction industry into a position where vitally important project functions, such as problem-solving is not procured, and hence, this fundamentally important aspect of the design and execution of projects is essentially self-organised (Pryke, et al 2017).…”
Section: Exploration Of the Effectiveness Or Otherwise Of Relationshimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous project management models and existing ways of understanding, organising and managing projects seem to have reached their limit of application, showing diminishing results (Winter et al, 2006;Chinowsky et al, 2008). Accordingly, there have been calls for new models and analytical tools that capture the social dimensions of project organising, and the essence of the inter-firm relationships that comprise the construction project coalition (Pryke, 2012). It is argued that the relationships associated with the dynamic, transient and 'time-defined' temporary organisation require further research (Burger and Sydow, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Frequency of repeat work or type of output (Artto et al, 2011;Davies and Brady, 2000;Whitley, 2006); 3. Frequency with which the same supply cluster or supply chain members can be used (Pryke, 2012).…”
Section: The Level Of the Project Businessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SMYTH e PRYKE, 2008;MORATTI, 2010;PRYKE, 2012; BEMELMANS, VOORDIJK e VOS, 2012), o tipo de relacionamentos contribuirá com a eficácia da organização dos sistemas de produção e, portanto, com seus resultados.…”
unclassified