2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Societal penetration of hydrogen into the future energy system: Impacts of policy, technology and carbon targets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It was further suggested that technology policies work better when coupled with carbon pricing mechanisms rather than cap-and-trade-mechanisms [38]. In comparison to additional previous studies [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51], our analysis shows that setting a carbon target policy enables more low carbon technologies to emerge in the energy mix compared with the pricing mechanism, and that leads to a faster transition with less technological options. Hence, we suggest that establishing new clean hydrocarbon technology policies combined with carbon pricing in order to accelerate energy transition based on the clean hydrocarbon technologies considered in our work.…”
Section: Impact Of Technology Policymentioning
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was further suggested that technology policies work better when coupled with carbon pricing mechanisms rather than cap-and-trade-mechanisms [38]. In comparison to additional previous studies [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51], our analysis shows that setting a carbon target policy enables more low carbon technologies to emerge in the energy mix compared with the pricing mechanism, and that leads to a faster transition with less technological options. Hence, we suggest that establishing new clean hydrocarbon technology policies combined with carbon pricing in order to accelerate energy transition based on the clean hydrocarbon technologies considered in our work.…”
Section: Impact Of Technology Policymentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Hence, we suggest that establishing new clean hydrocarbon technology policies combined with carbon pricing in order to accelerate energy transition based on the clean hydrocarbon technologies considered in our work. Our results also show that clean hydrocarbon technologies may be sufficient to achieve the climate targets, as shown by the stabilised emissions in Scenario 3, Figure 7, by 2025 without implementation of renewable sources of energy which most studies do not include [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51].…”
Section: Impact Of Technology Policymentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The two scenarios presented in this research are the maximum and minimum hydrogen penetration scenarios, as detailed in [22]. For the maximum hydrogen penetration scenario, city gas blend level is set to a 30% H 2 /City Gas ratio, nuclear power deployment is restricted in line with national policies and carbon targets are differentiated between OECD (80% CO 2 reduction required by 2050) and non‐OECD (60% by 2050) nations, representing differentiated carbon reduction goals, according to development level [3].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impacts and feasibility of CCS and energy storage media (including pumped hydro, battery storage and compressed air storage) are assessed regionally, accounting for cost and deployment limits [22].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase in population and evolution of the world economy has also resulted in an increasing energy demand, while fossil fuels are being depleted [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]. Therefore, there is a need for a transition from a fossil fuel-based economy to one based on renewables, which would allow us to limit global warming to well below 2 °C, in line with the Paris Agreement on climate change [ 1 , 4 ]. Hydrogen has the potential to be one of the clean fuels of the future, since, compared to fossil fuels, it has a high energy yield per unit mass of 122 KJ/g (2.75 times higher than that of fossil fuels) [ 5 ] and the only by-product released after combustion is water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%