2017
DOI: 10.15740/has/au/12.1/137-141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socio-economic characteristics and knowledge level of mango growers on plant protection measures in Ratnagiri district of Maharashtra

Abstract: SUMMARY :In research study conducted on mango growers in Kokan region of Maharashtra state with the major objectives of measuring the socio-economic characteristics and knowledge level of mango growers on plant protection measures. It was observed that the more than half (52.50 %) of the respondents were in middle age group, having (65.00 %) secondary to higher secondary level of education and medium size of land holding (61.66 %). More than half of the (57.50 %) of the respondents possessed 2 to 10.9 ha. of l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 indicates that majority of the mango growers belonging to the middle age (39.09%) followed by lower middle age (28.18%); young age (21.82%) and old age (10.91%) mango growers respectively. These same trends were also reported by many researchers [4,5,6,7]. This was also observed as one of the main reason due to which the rate of participation of all categories person is lower in training, meeting and development activities [8,9].…”
Section: Agesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Table 1 indicates that majority of the mango growers belonging to the middle age (39.09%) followed by lower middle age (28.18%); young age (21.82%) and old age (10.91%) mango growers respectively. These same trends were also reported by many researchers [4,5,6,7]. This was also observed as one of the main reason due to which the rate of participation of all categories person is lower in training, meeting and development activities [8,9].…”
Section: Agesupporting
confidence: 88%