Socio-spatial Inequalities and Social Cohesion in European Cities

Abstract

This paper addresses the increasing socio-spatial inequalities in European cities and their impact on the possibilities for fostering social cohesion. Many policy programmes tackle spatial unevenness in order to build more cohesive communities. These policies have some impact, but their effect on reducing inequalities at city level is limited. Therefore, an important question is how the overall socio-spatial organisation of European cities affects social cohesion and the capacity to form an urban community able to decide on a common future. First, the complex relation between present-day societal and spatial dynamics is discussed, asserting that it produces segregation. The second part reflects on how segregation is regarded in terms of social cohesion. Many authors stress the social innovative capacities within segregated areas. However, European cities display different socio-spatial structures. How these structures influence negotiation processes between different social groups is poorly treated. The last part of the paper addresses this issue.

Social Sustainability in Metropolitan Areas: Accessibility and Equity in the Case of the Metropolitan Area of Valencia (Spain)

“…Decision-makers must increasingly be in possession of strategies to make local government policies easier for industry, the unions and the public in the area to understand. The EU has been using different strategies to strengthen this aspect, such as the EU Territorial Agenda, the EESC Opinion on European metropolitan areas (OJEU C 168/10, 20.7.2007), the 6thReport on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion [28] and the 7th progress report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion [29,30]. Metropolitan areas are at the center of the political agenda and form a substantial part of the EU's territorial strategy [25].…”

The ‘Frozen’ Heart of the Continent: Place-Myths and Winnipeg in Canadian Crime Films

“…Contemporary literature suggests that researchers investigating places in society must take into account how and why individuals and/or groups in society become attached to particular places (Pollini, 2005;Dahl and Sorenson, 2010;Raymond et al, 2010;Rollero and De Piccoli, 2010;Lewicka, 2011;Cassiers and Kesteloot, 2012). In addition, researching the shared meanings of experiences becomes essential to place identification and the ways in which such individuals and VOL.…”

Poverty and social exclusion: An alternative spatial explanation

“…Brady, 2009;Ratcliffe, Krawczyk, 2011;Schierup, Ålund, 2011;Cassiers, Kesteloot, 2012;Holmertz, 2012;Bauman, 2013). Nevertheless, owing to the diversity of the phenomenon of urban, rural and regional development in the context of social deprivation, research focusing on its causes often calls for highlighting the more engrained historical and geographical contexts, which ought to serve as the basis for ensuant spatial analyses (Mahoney, 2000;Devicienti, Poggi, 2011;Saxonberg et al, 2013).…”