Socioeconomic status, parenting, and externalizing problems in African American single-mother homes: A person-oriented approach.

Anton, Margaret T.; Jones, Deborah J.; Youngstrom, Eric A.

doi:10.1037/fam0000086

Cited by 41 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 76 publications

(163 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This is in keeping with other reports (Radziszewska, Richardson, Dent, & Flay, 1996). However, it is important to note that recent investigations of parenting styles suggest that parental income and education do not associate identically with the dimensions of warmth and control (Anton, Jones, & Youngstrom, 2015).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 70%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Trait Emotion, Emotional Regulation, and Parenting Styles

Herzog

Hill-Chapman²,

Hardy³

et al. 2015

JEDP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study investigated relations among parenting styles and emotion regulation, trait emotion, and general well-being among 153 emerging adults. Two path models were tested, finding that parenting styles contributed to multiple pathways to emotional regulation. As expected, not only did participants who reported high levels of authoritative parenting endorse high levels of positive emotion, they also reported lower levels of emotional control and emotional self-awareness. These low levels were, in turn, associated with emotional well-being. Permissive parenting positively predicted negative emotion. Because authoritarian parenting did not directly predict trait emotion, a closer examination was conducted, showing that outcomes associated with this parenting style depended upon self-reported emotional control and trait emotion. The findings suggest that the effects of authoritarian parenting depend upon the emotional climate established in the family, a factor that may help to explain variability in outcomes for children of authoritarian parents depending upon socioeconomic status and ethnicity.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 70%

“…Rather they are situation-specific. As an example, contexts and cultures requiring social cohesion or an inordinate concern for child safety might naturally emphasize an authoritarian approach (Anton et al, 2015).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Trait Emotion, Emotional Regulation, and Parenting Styles

Herzog

Hill-Chapman²,

Hardy³

et al. 2015

JEDP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…High family SES is also a proxy of higher quantity and quality of parenting (Anton, Jones, & Youngstrom, 2015;Emmen et al, 2013;Kiang, Andrews, Stein, Supple, & Gonzalez, 2013;Perkins, Finegood, & Swain, 2013;Woods-Jaeger, Cho, Sexton, Slagel, & Goggin, 2018) and lower parental risk behaviors (Danese et al, 2009;Ladebauche, 1997;Spann et al, 2014;Subic-Wrana et al, 2011).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Race, Ethnicity, Family Socioeconomic Status, and Children’s Hippocampus Volume

Assari¹

2020

RHS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: The hippocampus has a significant role in memory, learning, and cognition. Although hippocampal size is highly susceptible to family socioeconomic status (SES) and associated stress, very little is known on racial and ethnic group differences in the effects of SES indicators on hippocampus volume among American children. Purpose: This study explored the multiplicative effects of race, ethnicity, and family SES on hippocampus volume among American children. Methods: Using data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD), we analyzed the functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) data of 9390 9-10 years old children. The main outcome was hippocampus volume. The predictor was parental education. Subjective family SES was the independent variable. Age, sex, and marital status were the covariates. Racial and ethnic group membership were the moderators. To analyze the data, we used regression models. Results: High subjective family SES was associated with larger hippocampus volume. This effect was significantly larger for Whites than Black families. Conclusions: The effect of subjective family SES on children’s hippocampus volume is weaker in Black than White families.

show abstract

“…Dengan pendapatan yang tinggi orang tua akan memenui kebutuhan anak secara bebas. Hal ini sedikit berbeda dengan penelitian yang dilakukan oleh Anton et al, (2015) bahwa terdapat pengaruh pendapatan keluarga dengan pemberian pola asuh. Semakin tinggi pendapatan keluarga semakin meingkatkan penggunaan pola asuh demokratis dan menurunkan pola asuh permisif.…”

Section: Pengaruh Panjang Badan Lahir Danunclassified

Biopsychosocial Factors, Life Course Perspective, and Their Influences on Language Development in Children

Safriana

Salimo²,

Dewi

2017

J MATERN CHILD HEALTH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Speech and language disorder if untreated may cause deficiency in reading, verbal, psychosocial, behavioral, and academic abilities. Studies have shown that birthweight, body length at birth, maternal education, parenting style, maternal stress, income at pregnancy, and current income can influence child development. This study aimed to determine the biopsychosocial factors, life course perspective, and their influences on language development in children. Subject and Method:This was an analytic observational study using case control design. The study was conducted in Surakarta, Central Java, from February to May 2017. A sample of 140 children aged 2 to 5 years old were selected for this study by fixed disease sampling with 1:3 ratio between case (children with speech and language disorder) and control (children without such disorder). The dependent variable was child speech and language development. The independent variables were birthweight, body length at birth, maternal education, maternal stress, parenting style, family income at pregnancy, and current family income. The data were collected by a set of questionnaire and medical record. The data on speech and language ability was measured by Denver II questionnaire. Path analysis was employed for data analysis. Results: Language development was directly and positively affected by democratic parenting style (b=0.46; SE=0.08; p<0.001), permissive parenting style (b=0.10; SE=0.11; p=0.020), birthweight (b=0.12; SE=0.02; p=0.002), maternal education (b=0.11; SE=0.31; p=0.007), maternal stress (b=-0.13; SE=0.04; p=0.013). Language development directly and negatively affected by autoritarian parenting style (b=-0.37; SE=0.09; p<0.001). Language development was indirectly affected by body length at birth, family income at pregnancy, and current family income. Conclusion: Language development is directly affected by parenting style, birthweight, maternal education, maternal stress.

show abstract

Socioeconomic status, parenting, and externalizing problems in African American single-mother homes: A person-oriented approach.

Cited by 41 publications

References 76 publications

Trait Emotion, Emotional Regulation, and Parenting Styles

Trait Emotion, Emotional Regulation, and Parenting Styles

Race, Ethnicity, Family Socioeconomic Status, and Children’s Hippocampus Volume

Biopsychosocial Factors, Life Course Perspective, and Their Influences on Language Development in Children

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About