2011
DOI: 10.1108/13527591111143718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soft factors affecting the performance of software development teams

Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to classify the factors affecting the performance of software development teams and stress the soft (non‐technical) factors affecting the performance of software development teams.Design/methodology/approachThis paper is based on the thorough secondary research and literature review of the past empirical studies published in reputed journals. The methodology followed is the secondary research based on extensive literature review of empirical studies done and analysis of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
100
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
8
100
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their failure rate is more than the failure rate of projects in other fields and also in the field of ICT such as infrastructure [3]. It is reported that 70% of SDPs result in failure [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their failure rate is more than the failure rate of projects in other fields and also in the field of ICT such as infrastructure [3]. It is reported that 70% of SDPs result in failure [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Since they are human centric, it is vital for the members to have good soft skills. Another difference is the fact that the cost estimation for an SDP is conducted at the initial stages of the project [5]. The main challenge of that is the fact that some of the organisations overcharge and other charge too low and eventually discover that the work which needs to be done cost more than what they have charged.…”
Section: The Difference Between Software Development Projects and mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When employees fail to meet key performance areas that seems to suggest that the firms' key activities gets compromised as value configuration based on the inadequate competencies necessary to execute the company's business model. Purna Sudhakar et al, (2011) are of the view that performance of a section will be positively or negatively affected by characteristics of having a clear goal, competent team members, result-oriented structure, collaborative climate, recognition, management support, motivation, high level of commitment…”
Section: Picbe |1016mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These benefits range from reduced cost to improved software quality, resulting in a competitive advantage that business organisations are constantly seeking (Niazi et al, 2013;Scharff, 2011). Mergers and acquisitions are also influencing the shift towards GSD, resulting in the production of innovative products, new markets, and access to a more diverse pool of software developers (Sudhakar, Farooq, & Patnaik, 2011). Recently, the outsourcing of software development experienced exceptional growth especially within European companies outsourcing to Indian IT companies (Søderberg, Krishna, & Bjørn, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These categories of challenges are very important subjects of study because human relations are crucial for the success of GSD projects. In fact, even more important than technical skills (Sudhakar et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%