2011
DOI: 10.1364/oe.19.00a786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soft holographic interference lithography microlens for enhanced organic light emitting diode light extraction

Abstract: Very uniform 2 μm-pitch square microlens arrays (μLAs), embossed on the blank glass side of an indium-tinoxide (ITO)-coated 1.1 mm-thick glass, are used to enhance light extraction from organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) by ~100%, significantly higher than enhancements reported previously. The array design and size relative to the OLED pixel size appear to be responsible for this enhancement. The arrays are fabricated by very economical soft lithography imprinting of a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) mold (itse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 32 ] However, when a pattern was desired in a metallic surface by LIL, typically hard or soft patterned stamps had to be fi rst fabricated by LIL and next the pattern had to be transferred into the metallic surface by wet or dry etching or nanoimprinting, approaches known as soft or hard interference lithography. [33][34][35] The direct application of LIL on aluminum (or any metallic surface) was restricted to extremely fl at surfaces and the patterning process could only be demonstrated on sputtered thin fi lms deposited on silicon wafers, which limited the maximum thickness (<1 μ m) of the porous membrane. [ 31 ] Only ultrathin AAO membranes with small pore aspect ratios (below 20) were feasible and the large versatility of these templates was lost.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 32 ] However, when a pattern was desired in a metallic surface by LIL, typically hard or soft patterned stamps had to be fi rst fabricated by LIL and next the pattern had to be transferred into the metallic surface by wet or dry etching or nanoimprinting, approaches known as soft or hard interference lithography. [33][34][35] The direct application of LIL on aluminum (or any metallic surface) was restricted to extremely fl at surfaces and the patterning process could only be demonstrated on sputtered thin fi lms deposited on silicon wafers, which limited the maximum thickness (<1 μ m) of the porous membrane. [ 31 ] Only ultrathin AAO membranes with small pore aspect ratios (below 20) were feasible and the large versatility of these templates was lost.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 This was achieved with softlithography imprinting of very uniform 2-μm-pitch square arrays, embossed on the blank side of a ITO-coated glass. By placing a microlens array on the other side of OLEDs, trapped light inside the substrate can be extracted.…”
Section: Enhanced Light Outcoupling In Light Emitting Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By placing a microlens array on the other side of OLEDs, trapped light inside the substrate can be extracted. 16 In general, methods to enhance light extraction of LEDs and OLEDs can be classified into two categories. One is texturing the surface of the lightemitting layer to extract light trapped inside.…”
Section: Enhanced Light Outcoupling In Light Emitting Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve better light extraction, various methods have been utilized, which can be classified into three major categories: (i) Modification of the emitting species, e.g., increasing the population of horizontally oriented emitting dipoles [73]; (ii) Modification of the ITO/substrate structure or interface [14,16,74,75]; (iii) Modification of the substrate/air interface [15,[76][77][78]. Recent studies have also shown that optimizing cavity effects and plasmon modes coupled with reflecting electrodes are also of major importance, affecting the outcoupling efficiency.…”
Section: Oled Efficienciesmentioning
confidence: 99%