2013
DOI: 10.12816/0015083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soft Tissue Facial Profile Analysis of Adult Iraqis with Different Classes of Malocclusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous Middle Eastern study found that Class II subjects had a greater value of the nasolabial angle than those with Class I; however, the difference was not significant (Gulsen et al, 2006). Conversely, other Middle Eastern studies suggested different results (Al-Saleem, 2013;Mohammed, Nissan & Taha, 2013) (CIs of NLA in Table 1 vs. their corresponding values in Table S5). A probable reason for this variability among outcomes might be the differences in the methods used to determine the nasolabial angle (Hwang, Kim & McNamara, 2000).…”
Section: Soft Tissue Componentsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…A previous Middle Eastern study found that Class II subjects had a greater value of the nasolabial angle than those with Class I; however, the difference was not significant (Gulsen et al, 2006). Conversely, other Middle Eastern studies suggested different results (Al-Saleem, 2013;Mohammed, Nissan & Taha, 2013) (CIs of NLA in Table 1 vs. their corresponding values in Table S5). A probable reason for this variability among outcomes might be the differences in the methods used to determine the nasolabial angle (Hwang, Kim & McNamara, 2000).…”
Section: Soft Tissue Componentsmentioning
confidence: 85%