2002
DOI: 10.1067/mod.2002.119780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soft tissue profile in Anatolian Turkish adults: Part I. Evaluation of horizontal lip position using different soft tissue analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
47
1
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
6
47
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Erbay, Caniklioğlu, Erbay et al 16 evaluated 96 Turkish adults aged between 21.63 and 22.45 years, with normal occlusion, and also found lips that were more retruded than the values recommended by Steiner 6 (women: S-LS=2.7mm and S-LI=-2.0mm, and men S-LS=3.3mm and S-LI=-2.7mm). Isiekwe et al 17 in evaluating 100 adult Nige-rian individuals (ages 18 to 25 years) with normal occlusion found the values of S-LS=5.89 mm and S-LI=8.19 mm, indicating lips that were much more protruded than the values established by Steiner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Erbay, Caniklioğlu, Erbay et al 16 evaluated 96 Turkish adults aged between 21.63 and 22.45 years, with normal occlusion, and also found lips that were more retruded than the values recommended by Steiner 6 (women: S-LS=2.7mm and S-LI=-2.0mm, and men S-LS=3.3mm and S-LI=-2.7mm). Isiekwe et al 17 in evaluating 100 adult Nige-rian individuals (ages 18 to 25 years) with normal occlusion found the values of S-LS=5.89 mm and S-LI=8.19 mm, indicating lips that were much more protruded than the values established by Steiner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However comparison of Class I and Class II showed that upper and lower lip in Class I group are signi icantly retrusive as compared to Class II. Erbay et al [14] reported that the lower lip was more protrusive in the females in the dentally normal group with relation to Steiner's reference line. However, according to Steiner's line both lips were more protrusive in females as compared to in males in both the dentally and skeletally normal groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They reported that the position of the lower lip in females was signi icantly more protruded than it was in males. Similarly, Erbay et al [14] concluded that the upper and lower lips were retruded according to the norms of Steiner and Ricketts. Both the upper and lower lip values were within the normal range according to Burstone's B line.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17] Values pertaining to the Turkish population are limited to the dentistry literature and existing studies have been conducted to find out the norm values of specific orthodontic analyses. [18][19][20][23][24][25] In one of these studies, Erbay et al used various linear lines and angles on Turkish adult subjects with Anatolian origins who pertained to Class I group. They measured the distance between the soft tissue parts of the upper and lower lips and these lines and compared measurements for males and females.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing studies have been directed to defining norms for different cephalometric analysis methods used in orthodonty rather than facial tissue thickness. [18][19][20] The aims of this study can be summarized as follows: 1-Comparative identification of facial tissue thicknesses in pre-pubertal period with respect to malocclusion groups in both genders in Turkish population, 2-Comparative identification of facial tissue thicknesses in post-pubertal period with respect to malocclusion groups for genders in Turkish population, and 3-Comparison of changes in soft tissue thickness in prepubertal and post-pubertal periods with respect to gender for different malocclusion groups in Turkish population. We believe the findings of this study will be helpful for orthodontic treatments and surgical operations in Turkey, also support identity determination studies and reconstruction processes in forensic anthropology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%