2018
DOI: 10.1007/s13319-018-0183-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Software Architectural Quality Assessment Model for Security Analysis Using Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The adoption of this process plays a key role in improving software security for the end users. Dayanandan & Kalimuthu (2018) evaluated the quality for security analysis. Authors of the paper proposed a framework for quality assessment at software architecture level.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adoption of this process plays a key role in improving software security for the end users. Dayanandan & Kalimuthu (2018) evaluated the quality for security analysis. Authors of the paper proposed a framework for quality assessment at software architecture level.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where w i = Fuzzy weight of the i factor (1) Fuzzy weights are defuzzified by centre of area (COA) method (Chou & Chang, 2008;Dayanandan & Kalimuthu, 2018) to obtain crisp value by using the below equation:…”
Section: Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (Fahp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This empirical study brings out "data security" and "trust on solution provider" as the most important and critical challenges for migration to cloud PLM adoption. - Dayanandan and Kalimuthu (2018) presented a software architectural quality assessment model for security analysis using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) method. The research results ensure that the proposed FAHP model with Buckley method performs better than existing methods in terms of security index to measure the performance at the SA level and defect density ratio to validate the results.…”
Section: Multi-criteria Decision-making and Its Usage In The Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%