Software for Writing Online Exam with Video and Audio Surveillance - Cheatless

Duric, Jurica; Mahmutovic, Alan

doi:10.23919/mipro52101.2021.9596723

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Coghlan et al (2021) as well as Henry and Oliver (2022) addressed the ethical aspects of OPS and discussed privacy at length, among other ethical aspects. Others (n=13) implicitly mentioned or discussed privacy among other challenges of OPS's implementation (Baume, 2019;Draaijer et al, 2018;González-González et al, 2020;Labayen et al, 2021), acceptance (Duric & Mahmutovic, 2021;Elshafey et al, 2021;Langenfeld, 2020;Meulmeester et al, 2021;Purohit & Ajmera, 2022;Silverman et al, 2021;Tripathi et al, 2022), trust (Nigam et al, 2021), and OPS's negative aspects (Bundin et al, 2021).…”

Section: Prisma Diagram Of the Literature Searchmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Information related to the individual's identification mostly includes students' full names, personal identification numbers, email addresses, phone numbers, student ID numbers, education institutions, email addresses, driving license, passport numbers, home address, and birth date (e.g., Balash et al, 2022;Bundin et al, 2021;Coghlan et al, 2021;Draaijer et al, 2018;Duric & Mahmutovic, 2021).…”

Section: Individual Identification Information 2 Monitoring and Contr...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Challenges to Academic Integrity from New Tools - A Survey of Students' Perceptions and Behaviors of Employing ChatGPT

Bergström,

Repo,

Tuunainen

2024

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Privacy is one of the key challenges to the adoption and implementation of online proctoring systems (OPS) in higher education. To better understand this challenge, we adopt privacy as contextual integrity theory to conduct a scoping review of 17 papers. The results show different types of students' personal and sensitive information are collected and disseminated; this raises considerable privacy concerns. As well as the governing principles including transparency and fairness, consent and choice, information minimization, accountability, and information security and accuracy have been identified to address privacy problems. This study notifies a need to clarify how these principles should be implemented and sustained, and what privacy concerns and actors they relate to. Further, it calls for the need to clarify the responsibility of key actors in enacting and sustaining responsible adoption and use of OPS in higher education.

show abstract