Partial Least Squares Path Modeling 2023
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-37772-3_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Software Packages for Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: An Updated Review

Sergio Venturini,
Mehmet Mehmetoglu,
Hengky Latan
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 72 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kono and Sato (2023) contended that, the procedures for model evaluation were clearly defined for CB-SEM but not for PLS-SEM. The common software packages including SmartPLS, ADANCO and cSEM that were used to run the PLS-SEM did not however incorporate the specific feature to evaluate the overall fit of PLS-SEM to data (Venturini, Mehmetoglu & Latan, 2023). It is very likely due to varying indicators' weights and scores across different composite models that renders it difficulty to develop a unique evaluation approach for model fit (Guenther, Guenther, Ringle, Zaefarian & Cartwright, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kono and Sato (2023) contended that, the procedures for model evaluation were clearly defined for CB-SEM but not for PLS-SEM. The common software packages including SmartPLS, ADANCO and cSEM that were used to run the PLS-SEM did not however incorporate the specific feature to evaluate the overall fit of PLS-SEM to data (Venturini, Mehmetoglu & Latan, 2023). It is very likely due to varying indicators' weights and scores across different composite models that renders it difficulty to develop a unique evaluation approach for model fit (Guenther, Guenther, Ringle, Zaefarian & Cartwright, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%