2019
DOI: 10.4236/jep.2019.102017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil Carbon Dioxide Emission: Soil Respiration Measurement in Temperate Grassland, Nepal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
15
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
6
15
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the open grassland of the same region has observed the visible linear relation with de ned PPFD effect on SR variation at 37.6% in October. The minimum (2.7 µ mol m −2 s −1 in 2016 and 1.3 µ mol m −2 s −1 in 2017) and maximum (96.2 µ mol m −2 s −1 in 2016 and 761.0 µ mol m −2 s −1 in 2017) PPFD values of PPFD of this study were comparably lower than the PPFD (51.68 and 1526.0 µ mol m −2 s −1 ) obtained in the nearby grassland (Dhital et al 2019). However, not only the ecologically adopted environmental parameters but the land use is also considered as one of the major factors affecting soil carbon emissions via SR (Li et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, the open grassland of the same region has observed the visible linear relation with de ned PPFD effect on SR variation at 37.6% in October. The minimum (2.7 µ mol m −2 s −1 in 2016 and 1.3 µ mol m −2 s −1 in 2017) and maximum (96.2 µ mol m −2 s −1 in 2016 and 761.0 µ mol m −2 s −1 in 2017) PPFD values of PPFD of this study were comparably lower than the PPFD (51.68 and 1526.0 µ mol m −2 s −1 ) obtained in the nearby grassland (Dhital et al 2019). However, not only the ecologically adopted environmental parameters but the land use is also considered as one of the major factors affecting soil carbon emissions via SR (Li et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…The temporal and diurnal variations in SR of this natural R. arboreum forest were very noticeable (Figure 5). The maximum values of SR (306.3 mg CO 2 m −2 h −1 in 2016 and 348.9 mg CO 2 m −2 h −1 in 2017) of this forest were recorded during afternoon from 11:00 am to 1:00 pm and the evening from 3:00 pm to 5:00 pm that was much consistent to the nearby temperate grassland of the region (Dhital et al 2019). However, the values of maximum SR of this forest were much less than (963.42 mg CO 2 m −2 h −1 in October 2015 and 1132.6 mg CO 2 m −2 h −1 in April 2016) that of the grassland site.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Rangpur at Mithapukur Ecopark the mean amount of moisture content, pH, conductivity, OM, SOC and soil respiration were found to 33.54, 5.98 ± 0.07, 78.44 ± 4.51 µs/cm, 0.42%, 348.84 ± 33.74 ton/ha and 82.13 ± 0.46 mg CO 2 /g soil, respectively (Table 2). In Nepal, Dhital et al (2019) reported that soil respiration averaged value was 357 mg CO 2 m -2 /h in October 2015, and in April 2016 it was 444.6 mg CO 2 m -2 /h. In Iran, Bakhshandeh et al (2019) found 206.71 ± 34.44 to 730.84 ± 81.69 mg CO 2 -C/kg soil of cumulative respiration (CumR) in 1, 2, 4, 28 days.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%