Soil differentiation and soil comprehensive evaluation of in wild and cultivated Fritillaria pallidiflora Schrenk

Dong, Jianrui; Zhao, Wenqing; Shi, Panyang; Zhou, Minghao; Liu, Zeyu; Wang, Yuchao

doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162049

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The reason may be that farmers often adopt different cropping strategies. After long-term cultivation, the spatial dependence of SOM decreases, while spatial heterogeneity increases ( Figure 2 i) [ 71 , 72 ]. Therefore, the impact range of SOM on As is relatively small.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Identifying the Local Influencing Factors of Arsenic Concentration in Suburban Soil: A Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression Approach

Zhu,

Liu,

Jin

et al. 2024

Toxics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Exploring the local influencing factors and sources of soil arsenic (As) is crucial for reducing As pollution, protecting soil ecology, and ensuring human health. Based on geographically weighted regression (GWR), multiscale GWR (MGWR) considers the different influence ranges of explanatory variables and thus adopts an adaptative bandwidth. It is an effective model in many fields but has not been used in exploring local influencing factors and sources of As. Therefore, using 200 samples collected from the northeastern black soil zone of China, this study examined the effectiveness of MGWR, revealed the spatial non-stationary relationship between As and environmental variables, and determined the local impact factors and pollution sources of As. The results showed that 49% of the samples had arsenic content exceeding the background value, and these samples were mainly distributed in the central and southern parts of the region. MGWR outperformed GWR with the adaptative bandwidth, with a lower Moran’s I of residuals and a higher R2 (0.559). The MGWR model revealed the spatially heterogeneous relationship between As and explanatory variables. Specifically, the road density and total nitrogen, clay, and silt contents were the primary or secondary influencing factors at most points. The distance from an industrial enterprise was the secondary influencing factor at only a few points. The main pollution sources of As were thus inferred as traffic and fertilizer, and industrial emissions were also included in the southern region. These findings highlight the importance of considering adaptative bandwidths for independent variables and demonstrate the effectiveness of MGWR in exploring local sources of soil pollutants.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%