2001
DOI: 10.1080/00380768.2001.10408434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil enzymatic activities in a hilly coffee plantation in lampung province, South Sumatra, Indonesia, under plant cover management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A large number of studies have been carried out on the changes in soil chemical properties (Lumbanraja et al 1998), organic matter content . humus composition , soil enzyme activities (Salam et al 2001). and also water nm-off and soil erosion (Afandi et al 1999) in disturbed areas of Lampung province, Sumatra island.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of studies have been carried out on the changes in soil chemical properties (Lumbanraja et al 1998), organic matter content . humus composition , soil enzyme activities (Salam et al 2001). and also water nm-off and soil erosion (Afandi et al 1999) in disturbed areas of Lampung province, Sumatra island.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Sarno et al (2004) reported that the presence of native understorey (Chromolaena odorata, Clidemia hirta, Imperata cylindrica, Melastoma affi ne, and Mikania micrantha) in a coffee plantation in a Vertic Dystrudept soil in Sumber Jaya, West Lampung, Indonesia increased available P compared with available P in the absence of these understorey species. In another study, Salam et al (2001) reported that in a coffee plantation, soil phosphatase activities in bulk soils in the plots with native understorey (158 μg p-nitrophenol g -1 h -1 ) were higher than those in the plots without understorey (108 μg p-nitrophenol g -1 h -1 ). In the rhizosphere soils the phosphatase activity difference between these plots might have been even higher (Trolove et al, 2003) but this was not measured in this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This condition will stabilize the water tension at field capacity (pF) on the soil, stabilizing the force of attraction between water molecules (cohesion) and between water molecules and soil particles (adhesion) becomes. If cohesion is stronger than adhesion, the water can't be bound by soil pores [24,25]. In addition to being influenced by the adhesive power, the soil's ability to bind water also depends on the type of soil.…”
Section: Water Deficitmentioning
confidence: 99%