1980
DOI: 10.1016/0038-092x(80)90391-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solar and terrestrial radiation dependent on the amount and type of cloud

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
236
0
9

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 497 publications
(252 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
7
236
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of n/N is one on cloudless days, so the clear-sky transmissivity is A a + B a . For time periods and stations where sunshine hours (n) were not available, the Hargreaves method as modified by Supit and Van Kappel (1998) 2) does not explicitly consider the effect of changes in the physical or optical properties of clouds on incoming radiation (Haurwitz, 1946;Kasten and Czeplak, 1980;Rossow and Lacis, 1990). Variability in cloud properties, including over small spatial scales (Rossow, 1989), may preclude the use of a simple relationship between visual cloud cover and incoming solar radiation as assumed in the Hargreaves relation.…”
Section: Angstrom and Hargreaves Equations With Correction For Aerosolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The value of n/N is one on cloudless days, so the clear-sky transmissivity is A a + B a . For time periods and stations where sunshine hours (n) were not available, the Hargreaves method as modified by Supit and Van Kappel (1998) 2) does not explicitly consider the effect of changes in the physical or optical properties of clouds on incoming radiation (Haurwitz, 1946;Kasten and Czeplak, 1980;Rossow and Lacis, 1990). Variability in cloud properties, including over small spatial scales (Rossow, 1989), may preclude the use of a simple relationship between visual cloud cover and incoming solar radiation as assumed in the Hargreaves relation.…”
Section: Angstrom and Hargreaves Equations With Correction For Aerosolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variability in cloud properties, including over small spatial scales (Rossow, 1989), may preclude the use of a simple relationship between visual cloud cover and incoming solar radiation as assumed in the Hargreaves relation. A full radiative transfer model (Chou and Zhao, 1997) or separate transmissivities by cloud type (Kasten and Czeplak, 1980) could account for cloud physical properties, but the IMD historical data used here cannot reliably predict those properties. The purpose of the present investigation is to test the utility of a simple relationship (Equation 2) appropriate for a given data set in a single river basin, and to use that relationship to leverage historical cloudiness data that do not include detailed cloud property measurements.…”
Section: Angstrom and Hargreaves Equations With Correction For Aerosolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It provides a first distinction of cloud radiative effects using the available data base (Foyo-Moreno et al, 2001). Different studies have followed similar procedures in their analysis of the cloud radiative effect over the whole solar spectrum, over UV and over photosynthetically active radiation (Kasten and Czeplak, 1980;Blumthaler et al, 1994;Davies, 1995;Alados et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cloud cover parameters was calculated from the empirical formula proposed by Kasten and Czeplak [4]. Cc = 1 0.75(N/8) 3.4 (1) Where N is a parameter describing the daily average cloudiness of the sky.…”
Section: Atmospheric Turbidity Factormentioning
confidence: 99%