Solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography with atomic emission detection for multiresidue determination of pesticides in honey

Campillo, Natalia; Peñalver, Rosa; Aguinaga, Nerea; Hernández‐Córdoba, Manuel

doi:10.1016/j.aca.2006.01.034

Cited by 53 publications

(29 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…For analyzing pesticide residues in honey, SPME has been already tested in a few studies with recoveries comparable to those obtained in the present study (Capillo et al 2006;Volante et al 2001;Yu et al 2004). The significantly lower recoveries in honey solution compared to water were also noted in these studies (Capillo et al 2006;Volante et al 2001;Yu et al 2004).…”

Section: Comparison Of Methodssupporting

confidence: 51%

“…The significantly lower recoveries in honey solution compared to water were also noted in these studies (Capillo et al 2006;Volante et al 2001;Yu et al 2004). Traditional sample treatment methods are almost invariably based on solvent and solid-phase extraction followed, sometimes, by various cleanup steps.…”

Section: Comparison Of Methodsmentioning

confidence: 58%

“…Traditional sample treatment methods are almost invariably based on solvent and solid-phase extraction followed, sometimes, by various cleanup steps. These method provided higher recoveries (Blasco et al 2003;Fernandez et al 2002b;Fernandez et al 2002a) but SPME is a relatively easy and fast technique for the analysis of pesticides present in trace amounts and presents the advantage of avoiding the use of organic solvents (Capillo et al 2006;Volante et al 2001;Yu et al 2004). …”

Section: Comparison Of Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Few publications involving SPME for the purpose considered here have been found in the literature (Yu et al 2004;Volante et al 2001;Capillo et al 2006), despite the fact that honey is an obvious subject for using SPME because its solubility in water. None of the above articles used LC-MS, even through the last reviews published on the subject clearly demonstrate that LC is currently competing with GC for the status of reference analytical technique to determine pesticide residues.…”

Section: Organophosphorus Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Most SPME were carried out in combination with GC with different detectors (Capillo et al 2006;Yu et al 2004;Volante et al 2001). However, the method described here is based on separation and determination by LC-MS, which allows to increase the number of pesticides analyzable because LC-MS is able to determine any compound independently of its volatility and thermolability (Pico et al 2004).…”

Section: Comparison Of Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Solid-phase microextraction-liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry applied to the analysis of insecticides in honey

Blasco

Font

Picó

2007

Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

. Solid-phase microextraction-liquid chromatographymass spectrometry applied to the analysis of insecticides in honey. Food Additives and Contaminants, 2007, 25 (01) AbstractAn approach based on solid-phase microextraction-liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (SPME-LC-MS) has been developed for determining 12 insecticides (bromophos ethyl, chlorpyrifos methyl, chlorpyrifos ethyl, diazinon, fenoxycarb, fonofos, phenthoate, phosalone, pirimiphos methyl, profenofos, pyrazophos, and temephos) in honey. The influence of several parameters on the efficiency of the SPME was systematically investigated. Under optimal conditions, the procedure provided excellent linearity (>0.990), detection and quantification limits (between 0.001 and 0.1 µg g -1 and between 0.005 and 0.5 µg g -1 , respectively), and precision (<19 % at the quantification limits and from 6 to 14 % at ten times higher concentrations). However, recoveries were not so good, ranging from 19 to 92 %. Honey samples were found which were contaminated with bromophos ethyl, diazinon, fonofos, pirimiphos ethyl, pyrazophos and temephos at estimated concentrations from 6.2 ± 1.2 to 19 ± 3 ng g -1 .

show abstract

Section: Comparison Of Methodssupporting

confidence: 51%

Section: Comparison Of Methodsmentioning

confidence: 58%

Section: Comparison Of Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Organophosphorus Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Comparison Of Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Solid-phase microextraction-liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry applied to the analysis of insecticides in honey

Blasco

Font

Picó

2007

Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

New Sample Preparation Strategies for Analytical Determinations

Quintana

Ramil

Rodil

et al. 2014

Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sample preparation techniques have experienced an explosive development during the past decades. Procedural approached that uses minimal sample amounts reducing to the limit and sometimes eliminating completely the use of toxic and/or environmentally unfriendly solvents and reagents have emerged as standard in the analytical laboratory. At the same time, significant improvements in sensitivity and selectivity have appeared. This article revisited the principal developments of sample preparation methods for analytical determinations as produced recently. The approach is systematic, classifying the procedures into two broad groups: methods based on equilibrium and exhaustive methods. In each case, the principal methods are revisited with a brief description about the principles and chemistry involved and some examples in each case. A large number of bibliographic references allow a deeper study on each case, when necessary.

show abstract

Sample Preparation Strategies for Analytical Determinations

Torrijos¹,

Mariño²,

Montes³

et al. 2019

Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sample preparation techniques have experienced an explosive development during the past decades. Procedural approaches that use minimal sample amounts reducing to the limit and sometimes eliminating completely the use of toxic and/or environmentally unfriendly solvents and reagents have emerged as standard in the analytical laboratory. At the same time, significant improvements in sensitivity and selectivity have appeared. This article revised the principal developments of sample preparation methods for analytical determinations as produced recently. The approach is systematic, classifying the procedures into two broad groups: methods based on equilibrium and exhaustive methods. In each case, the principal methods are revisited with a brief description about the principles and chemistry involved and some significant examples. A large number of bibliographic references allow a deeper study on each case, when necessary.

show abstract

Solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography with atomic emission detection for multiresidue determination of pesticides in honey

Cited by 53 publications

References 26 publications

Solid-phase microextraction-liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry applied to the analysis of insecticides in honey

Solid-phase microextraction-liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry applied to the analysis of insecticides in honey

New Sample Preparation Strategies for Analytical Determinations

Sample Preparation Strategies for Analytical Determinations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About