2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2016.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soluble c-Met Levels Correlated With Tissue c-Met Protein Expression in Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The β chain in the extracellular domain can be proteolytically cleaved and released as scMet. Consistent with our findings, Gao et al recently reported a significant correlation between scMet levels and NSCLC tumor cMet protein expression, and that patients with high scMet levels had poor OS [34]. In our study, tumor measures of HGF/cMet pathway activation were not associated with better survival outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The β chain in the extracellular domain can be proteolytically cleaved and released as scMet. Consistent with our findings, Gao et al recently reported a significant correlation between scMet levels and NSCLC tumor cMet protein expression, and that patients with high scMet levels had poor OS [34]. In our study, tumor measures of HGF/cMet pathway activation were not associated with better survival outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…No correlations among baseline circulating markers were found. The soluble cMet protein has been shown to correlate with tumor cMet protein expression in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [34]. Here, soluble HGF was correlated with tumor cMet (r = 0.62, p = 0.056), HGF (r = 0.54, p = 0.106) and the cMet-HGF complex (r = 0.65, p = 0.044) and soluble cMet was correlated with the cMet-HGF complex (r = 0.58, p = 0.0677).…”
Section: Prognostic Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The OS was 9.5 vs. 22.2 months for patients with high sMet levels (>766 ng/mL) compared with patients having low levels of sMet (<766 ng/mL, respectively, p < .001). The average plasma sMET concentration was significantly higher in tissue MET-positive patients compared to subjects with MET-negative tumors or healthy individuals [57]. The results of multivariate analysis in another study suggested that the sMet concentration was the strongest prognostic factor for PFS after EGFR-TKI therapy (HR 3.583, 95% CI 1.379-9.312) [181].…”
Section: Iv-circulating Met Levels As Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Several clinical studies have addressed these issues and reported MET aberrations as indicators of short survival and clinicopathological features of advanced disease in diverse types of cancer, such as gastric [52], colorectal [53], breast [54], hepatocellular [55], pancreatic [56], and lung cancer [57]. In addition, the predictive role of MET dysregulation has been explored in different settings, and some results indicate improved Figure 2.…”
Section: I-a-the Importance Of Hgf/met Aberrations As Clinical Biomarmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation