1993
DOI: 10.1021/ac00071a019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solution microstructure and electrochemical reactivity. Effect of probe partitioning on electrochemical formal potentials in microheterogeneous solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, water molecules must break the nonpolar barrier around the droplets and diffuse to the surface of the electrode before the charge transfer reaction takes place. 23 In the cathodic region, water reduction should be facilitated by a migration component towards the electrode due to the net positive charge located into the water droplets, which can explain that no reduction wave is observed in the experimental conditions of this study. On the other hand, assuming that for the water reduction reaction the diffusion coefficient value D w/o will be closer to the one found from DLS measurements, the limiting current will be theoretically around 6 nA, calculated from equation (1) using D w/o = 5.4 x 10 -8 cm 2 s -1 (see Table 2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, water molecules must break the nonpolar barrier around the droplets and diffuse to the surface of the electrode before the charge transfer reaction takes place. 23 In the cathodic region, water reduction should be facilitated by a migration component towards the electrode due to the net positive charge located into the water droplets, which can explain that no reduction wave is observed in the experimental conditions of this study. On the other hand, assuming that for the water reduction reaction the diffusion coefficient value D w/o will be closer to the one found from DLS measurements, the limiting current will be theoretically around 6 nA, calculated from equation (1) using D w/o = 5.4 x 10 -8 cm 2 s -1 (see Table 2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…23 This hypothesis could also explain the diffusion coefficient value found for Fc in ME, higher than the value found for D w/o , in spite of the Fc much lower concentration.…”
Section: Electrochemical Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations