2000
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-2311-4_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Somaclonal Variation and Genetic Molecular Markers in Woody Plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 152 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The loss of ability to regenerate could be explained by either loss or mutation of genes essential for regeneration, or by changes in ploidy level (Deverno 1995). The activation and insertion of transposable elements is another mechanism that can cause variation in tissue culture during repeated subcultures (Fourré 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The loss of ability to regenerate could be explained by either loss or mutation of genes essential for regeneration, or by changes in ploidy level (Deverno 1995). The activation and insertion of transposable elements is another mechanism that can cause variation in tissue culture during repeated subcultures (Fourré 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, early detection of variants is important so that deleterious effects that might be expressed later in growth do not result in having a severe economic impact (Fourré 2000). In in vitro culture, several factors, such as exposure to high concentrations of growth regulators and long-term maintenance under artificial conditions, can be potential inducers of somaclonal variation (DeVerno 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, it is important to know the frequency, genomic distribution, mechanisms, and factors influencing somaclonal variation (Polanco and Ruiz 2002). Direct methods, as molecular (Al-Zahim et al 1999;Fourré 2000;Gesteira et al 2002;Polanco and Ruiz 2002;Encheva et al 2003;Renau-Morata et al 2005;Chen et al 2006), cytometric (Brutovská et al 1998;Thiem and Sliwinska 2003;Alan et al 2007;Parc et al 2007), and cytogenetic tools (Kochevenko et al 1996;Fourré et al 1997;Brutovská et al 1998;Al-Zahim et al 1999;Do et al 1999;Tremblay et al 1999;Menéndes-Yuffá et al 2000) have been used to detect and select somaclonal variants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The first molecular studies of SE in conifers, including pines, were performed with the aim of evaluating genetic stability of the cultures (Fourré 2000). The occurrence of genetic alterations, which may include changes in chromosome number and/or structure and in DNA sequence, is one of the most often suggested causes for loss of se maturation capacity in aged conifer EM and for deviation from normal embryo development.…”
Section: Molecular Markers To Evaluate Genetic Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%