Some consequences of the analytical theory of the ferromagnetic hysteresis

Biorci, G.; Pescetti, D.

doi:10.1051/jphysrad:01959002002-3023300

Cited by 20 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The form we have chosen for the function F, given in equation ( 3), is perhaps the simplest form describing a single peak in the ( , H d) plane th a t is symmetric against interchange of H n and H d. More complex distributions could readily be described, for example, by a sum of several such functions; this would require extensive experimental data. Biorci & Pescetti (1958,1959) studied a similar model to th a t discussed here. They tried to estimate the function corresponding to our F(HU , Hd) from the major loops alone.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 92%

Magnetic hysteresis and minor loops: models and experiments

Barker

Schreiber

Huth

et al. 1983

Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The features of minor loop behaviour in magnetic hysteresis are examined by comparing some experimental data on a Mn‒Al‒Ge film with two phenomenological models. The ‘independent particle’ model of Preisach and Everett proves to describe qualitatively all the observed behaviour. This model is generalized slightly to allow for the interaction of the ‘particle’ through an average demagnetizing field, and a convenient method for calculating the consequences of the model is described.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 92%

Magnetic hysteresis and minor loops: models and experiments

Barker

Schreiber

Huth

et al. 1983

Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Since its publication in the 1930s of the last century (Preisach 1935), the model has been further developed and improved and many valuable facts have been accumulated (Everett and Whitton 1952;Everett 1954Everett , 1955Enderby 1956;Biorci and Pescetti 1958, 1959, 1966Brown 1962;Bate 1962;Woodward and Della Torre 1960;Della Torre 1965;Damlanian and Visintin 1983;Visintin 1984;Barker et al 1985;Brokate and Visintin 1989;. Since its publication in the 1930s of the last century (Preisach 1935), the model has been further developed and improved and many valuable facts have been accumulated (Everett and Whitton 1952;Everett 1954Everett , 1955Enderby 1956;Biorci and Pescetti 1958, 1959, 1966Brown 1962;Bate 1962;Woodward and Della Torre 1960;Della Torre 1965;Damlanian and Visintin 1983;Visintin 1984;Barker et al 1985;Brokate and Visintin 1989;.…”

Section: Definition and Main Properties Of Preisach Hysteresis Operatorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hysteresis Phenomena in Biology

Noori

2014

SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The change in the magnetization can locally be illustrated by the incremental permeability

. Each incremental permeability of a magnetizing or demagnetizing process is represented by a line segment in the plane [ 151 , 181 , 182 ] as illustrated in Figure 25 .…”

Section: Changes Of Magnetizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Review of Play and Preisach Models for Hysteresis in Magnetic Materials

Mörée

Leijon

2023

Materials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper studies the properties of the Preisach model and the play model, and compare their similarities. Both are history-dependent hysteresis models that are used to model magnetic hysteresis. They are described as discrete sums of simple hysteresis operators but can easily be reformulated as integral equations of continuous distribution functions using either a Preisach weight distribution function or a play distribution function. The models are mostly seen as phenomenological or mathematical tools but can also be related to friction-like pinning of domain-wall motions, where Rayleigh’s law of magnetic hysteresis can be seen as the simplest case on either the play model or the Preisach model. They are poor at modeling other domain behavior, such as nucleation-driven hysteresis. Yet another hysteresis model is the stop model, which can be seen as the inverted version of the play model. This type of model has advantages for expressions linked to energy and can be related to Steinmetz equation of hysteresis losses. The models share several mathematical properties, such as the congruency property and wiping-out property, and both models have a history of dependence that can be described by the series of past reversal points. More generally, it is shown that the many models can be expressed as Preisach models, showing that they can be treated as subcategories of the Preisach type models. These include the play model, the stop model and also the alternative KP-hysteron model.

show abstract

Some consequences of the analytical theory of the ferromagnetic hysteresis

Cited by 20 publications

References 1 publication

Magnetic hysteresis and minor loops: models and experiments

Magnetic hysteresis and minor loops: models and experiments

Hysteresis Phenomena in Biology

Review of Play and Preisach Models for Hysteresis in Magnetic Materials

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About