2002
DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/13/7/313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some considerations on the accuracy and frequency response of some derivative filters applied to particle image velocimetry vector fields

Abstract: This paper concerns the computation of derivatives from particle image velocimetry (PIV) velocity fields with the goal of obtaining the vorticity component normal to the plane. A variety of derivative schemes are characterized by their transfer function, taking into account the truncation and noise amplification. The PIV measurement noise is supposed to be a white one in the Fourier space. A spectral approach is used in order to choose the best filter for turbulent flows. The derivative spectra are disc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
153
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
153
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…33 Gaussian smoothing, characterized by a filter width of σ ≈ 10 y + , of the velocity field is performed after which the available velocity gradients are calculated using a second order least squares difference scheme. 34 Care is taken to ensure that the filter width is smaller than the Taylor micro-scale λ T ≈ 180 y + , to prevent affecting the relevant flow scales. Subsequent conditional sampling is performed on the raw unfiltered velocity fields.…”
Section: A T/nt Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 Gaussian smoothing, characterized by a filter width of σ ≈ 10 y + , of the velocity field is performed after which the available velocity gradients are calculated using a second order least squares difference scheme. 34 Care is taken to ensure that the filter width is smaller than the Taylor micro-scale λ T ≈ 180 y + , to prevent affecting the relevant flow scales. Subsequent conditional sampling is performed on the raw unfiltered velocity fields.…”
Section: A T/nt Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It must be noted that the vorticity sampling window size determines the vorticity computation based on a particular vortex scale. [14][15][16] There is a need to obtain the optimal vorticity calculation and mapping, which produces vorticity values with the same range in each localized spatial group such that a vortex can be visually observed when the values are mapped onto a color scale. Typically, setting a large vorticity sampling size can remove noise fluctuations and obtain vorticity maps with minimum intra-class and maximum inter-class vorticity group values.…”
Section: Flow Grid Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 top line). This is expected since, for EU, an increase of time separation, dt, decreases the precision error, ε 2 u 2dt 2 , associated with the uncertainty on the velocity field, but intensifies the truncation error, dt 2 6 ∂ 3 u ∂t , stemming from the discretisation scheme (see van Oudheusden, 2013), a behaviour also observed for derivative filters (Foucaut and Stanislas, 2002). Therefore, for good quality data, as is the case of zero noise, it is the truncation error that is more prominent and dictates small time separations to be used.…”
Section: Convection Velocity and Frame Time-separation Dependencementioning
confidence: 86%