“…In recent decades, new information, such as chromosome numbers (e.g., Kondo, 1976), pollen morphology (Takahashi and Sohma, 1982), secondary compounds (Culham and Gornall, 1994), and seed germination types (Conran, Jaudzems, and Hallam, 1997), has been added. Although new systems have been proposed recently (Marchant, Ashton, and George, 1982;Seine and Barthlott, 1994;Schlauer, 1996), the delimitations of the subgenera and sections of Drosera are controversial. Williams, Albert, and Chase (1994) inferred the phylogenetic relationship of 12 Drosera species covering most sections sensu Seine and Barthlott (1994), but the phylogenetic relationships within Drosera, which is morphologically divergent and includes more than 150 species, are still ambiguous, because the few species selected from each section have not been sufficient for an overview of the general phylogenetic relationships of Drosera.…”